The jmx beans created by Yammer have been changed to the new names.
However, the global mbeans have different names from the topic level
mbeans. The new mbeans have completely different names from the old ones
since they no longer have quotes. Does that answer your question?

Thanks,

Jun

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Kyle Banker <kyleban...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Jun. I'm pretty sure, though not 100% confident, that this has
> caused a change in the way that these metrics are reported to Yammer
> metrics (I believe that they are stomping on each other). Is that intended
> as well?
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Yes, we refactored the mbean names in 0.8.2.0 to make them more standard.
> > Those metrics are now registered under the following names. I did some
> > quick test and the values do get updated.
> >
> > kafka.server:type=BrokerTopicMetrics,name=BytesInPerSec
> > kafka.server:type=BrokerTopicMetrics,name=BytesInPerSec,topic=test
> >
> > The full list of the refactored mbean names can be found at
> > http://kafka.apache.org/082/documentation.html#monitoring
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Kyle Banker <kyleban...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I've been using a custom KafkaMetricsReporter to report Kafka broker
> > > metrics to Graphite. In v0.8.1.1, Kafka was reporting bytes and
> messages
> > in
> > > and out for all topics together and for each individual topic.
> > >
> > > After upgrading to v0.8.2.0, these metrics are no longer being
> reported.
> > >
> > > I'm only seeing the following:
> > > BrokerTopicMetrics
> > > - BytesInPerSec
> > > - BytesOutPerSec
> > > - BytesRejectedPerSec
> > > - MessagesInPerSec
> > >
> > > What's more, despite lots of successful writes to the cluster, the
> values
> > > for these remaining metrics are all zero.
> > >
> > > I saw that there was some refactoring of metric naming code. Was the
> > > behavior supposed to have changed?
> > >
> > > Many thanks in advance.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to