On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Christopher Piggott <cpigg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > The consumer used Zookeeper to store offsets, in 0.8.2 there's an option
> to use Kafka itself for that (by setting *offsets.storage = kafka
>
> Does it still really live in zookeeper, and kafka is proxying the requests
> through?
>
>
They don't live in Zookeeper. They live in a secret Kafka topic (__offsets
or something like that).

For migration purposes, you can set dual.commit.enable = true and then
offsets will be stored in both Kafka and ZK, but the intention is to
migrate to 100% Kafka storage.



> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Gwen Shapira <gshap...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Eduardo,
> >
> > 1. "Why sometimes the applications prefer to connect to zookeeper instead
> > brokers?"
> >
> > I assume you are talking about the clients and some of our tools?
> > These are parts of an older design and we are actively working on fixing
> > this. The consumer used Zookeeper to store offsets, in 0.8.2 there's an
> > option to use Kafka itself for that (by setting *offsets.storage =
> kafka*).
> > We are planning on fixing the tools in 0.9, but obviously they are less
> > performance sensitive than the consumers.
> >
> > 2. Regarding your tests and disk usage - I'm not sure exactly what fills
> > your disk - if its the kafka transaction logs (i.e. log.dir), then we
> > expect to store the size of all messages sent times the replication
> faction
> > configured for each topic. We keep messages for the amount of time
> > specified in *log.retention* parameters. If the disk is filled within
> > minutes, either set log.retention.minutes very low (at risk of losing
> data
> > if consumers need restart), or make sure your disk capacity matches the
> > rates in which producers send data.
> >
> > Gwen
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Eduardo Costa Alfaia <
> > e.costaalf...@unibs.it
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I have some doubts about the Kafka, the first is Why sometimes the
> > > applications prefer to connect to zookeeper instead brokers? Connecting
> > to
> > > zookeeper could create an overhead, because we are inserting other
> > element
> > > between producer and consumer. Another question is about the
> information
> > > sent by producer, in my tests the producer send the messages to brokers
> > and
> > > a few minutes my HardDisk is full (my harddisk has 250GB), is there
> > > something to do in the configuration to minimize this?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > --
> > > Informativa sulla Privacy: http://www.unibs.it/node/8155
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to