Thanks guys, for your information, I will do some performance tests

Em qua, 23 de nov de 2016 às 05:14, Ignacio Solis <iso...@igso.net>
escreveu:

> At LinkedIn we have a number of use cases for large messages.  We stick to
> the 1MB message limit at the high end though.
>
> Nacho
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > This has been our experience as well. I think the largest we've seen
> > in production is 50MB.
> >
> > If you have performance numbers you can share for the large messages,
> > I think we'll all appreciate :)
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Tauzell, Dave
> > <dave.tauz...@surescripts.com> wrote:
> > > I ran tests with a mix of messages, some as large as 20MB.   These
> large
> > messages do slow down processing, but it still works.
> > >
> > > -Dave
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: h...@confluent.io [mailto:h...@confluent.io]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:41 PM
> > > To: users@kafka.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Oversized Message 40k
> > >
> > > The default config handles messages up to 1MB so you should be fine.
> > >
> > > -hans
> > >
> > >> On Nov 22, 2016, at 4:00 AM, Felipe Santos <felip...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I read on documentation that kafka is not optimized for big messages,
> > >> what is considered a big message?
> > >>
> > >> For us the messages will be on average from 20k ~ 40k? Is this a real
> > >> problem?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> --
> > >> Felipe Santos
> > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
> > contain sensitive information, and are intended solely for the use of the
> > individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received
> this
> > e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail immediately and
> > destroy all copies of the e-mail and any attachments.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gwen Shapira
> > Product Manager | Confluent
> > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Nacho - Ignacio Solis - iso...@igso.net
>

Reply via email to