This is an excellent suggestion and I intend to do so henceforth
(thanks!), but it would be an adjunct to my request rather than the
answer; it still needs to be made clear in the docs/faq that you
*can't* use windows directly.

jan

On 07/08/2018, Rahul Singh <rahul.xavier.si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would recommend using Docker — it would end up being run on a Linux kernel
> VM on windows and is easier to get started on with a bit of learning curve
> for Docker. Less time wasted overall and at least at that point you would
> know Docker.
>
> Rahul
> On Aug 7, 2018, 4:50 AM -0400, jan <rtm4...@googlemail.com.invalid>, wrote:
>> I tried using it just for learning a while back and wasted 3 days
>> because it's not supported on windows. Even basic stuff didn't work. I
>> did read the docs first!
>>
>> I think I've seen other people on this list have questions
>> about/problems for exactly the same reason, and that could be a lot of
>> time saved if it was in the docs - it needs to be. So how do I ask the
>> maintainers to put 'No, Not Windows" in there?
>> Serious question.
>>
>> I resent losing 3 days of work because of essential missing info. It
>> sounds like (compared to @M. Manna) that I got off lightly.
>>
>> So can we put a clear caveat in the documentation, please, right at the
>> top?
>>
>> jan
>>
>> On 07/08/2018, M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > The answer is - Absolutely not. If you don’t have Linux rack, or
>> > Kubernetes
>> > deployment -it will not work on Windows as guaranteed.
>> >
>> > I know this because I have tried to make it work for the past 1 year.
>> > File
>> > handling always fails and crashes the cluster on Windows.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 at 01:54, Alew <ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi!
>> > >
>> > > Is it recommended to use production Kafka cluster on Windows?
>> > >
>> > > Can't get it from the documentation. It is possible to start Kafka on
>> > > Windows, but maybe it's for development purposes only.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>

Reply via email to