Israel, I am not aware of any apache docker repository. It seems preferable to keep it in your own repository at this stage. Otherwise, you would depend on committers/PMC members to update the image which is not ideal for your project, I suppose.
Best, David On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 12:56 PM Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com> wrote: > David > > I have one more question: do we have a Docker Hub account where the Docker > images can be hosted? > > I am fine using my personal account but it would be better if it were > something like apache/kafka:3.1.0-rc2 or just kafka/3.1.0-rc2 instead of > izzyacademy/kafka:3.1.0-rc2 > > I can still use my personal account but it would look better and give > others opportunities to manage the images as well without depending on my > personal Docker Hub account > > Your initial feedback was great and I am going to trim the prep process by > prepping some base images to cut down the Docker image build elapsed time > > Thank you again > > Sincerely > Israel > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:45 PM Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Thanks for the feedback David. I really appreciate it. >> >> I would work on eliminating some items in the docker container that are >> not needed and making this as a base image that already has >> those dependencies pre-baked. >> >> That could significantly trim the elapsed time between when they fire up >> the container and when they can get started with the validation. >> >> Let me update this and will share another update again soon. >> >> I appreciate this feedback >> >> Thanks. >> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:51 AM 'David Jacot' via kafka-clients < >> kafka-clie...@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Israel, >>> >>> Thank you for this initiative. >>> >>> The tool seems pretty cool and I think that it could be useful as well. I >>> haven't tried it yet though. >>> >>> I just watched the video and I found the part which requires to build >>> the docker container really long, perhaps even longer than the >>> validation itself (running the test apart). Could we simplify this? >>> >>> Automating the validation process is a great and risky thing at the >>> same time. Imagine if we would introduce a bug in the scripts. We >>> could all miss an issue in the RC. This is the advantage of our >>> current, boring and manual process. I feel like we would always >>> need some sort of manual sanity checks anyway. >>> >>> It is hard to say if this will really help to have more people validating >>> the release candidates. However, we could advertise it again when >>> we publish RCs for 3.1.0, by mentioning it in the thread, and see if >>> it helps folks. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> David >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 2:06 PM Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Everyone, >>>> >>>> Please take a moment to review this and share your thoughts. It would be >>>> great to have more community involvement during release candidate >>>> validations >>>> >>>> I am wondering if this should be split up between the site docs repo and >>>> the core code repo or just in the code repo >>>> >>>> Should we include this in future release candidate voting notifications >>>> to >>>> the community? >>>> >>>> Also do you think we even need this at all? >>>> >>>> When you have a moment please let me know >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:18 PM Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Before you Vote for Apache Kafka RCs, Watch This! >>>> > >>>> > https://youtu.be/T1VqFszLuQs >>>> > >>>> > Hello Kafka Community Members and welcome to the Apache Kafka Release >>>> > Party! >>>> > >>>> > As part of an effort (KAFKA-9861) to get more community participation >>>> > during release candidate (RC) validations, we have created the >>>> following >>>> > steps to hopefully allow more community members to participate >>>> thoroughly >>>> > in this validation process prior to casting their votes for specific >>>> RCs. >>>> > >>>> > It is also our hope that more community members will be able to >>>> > participate in the process as a result. If you have any suggestions >>>> for >>>> > improvement or would like to share changes, please feel free to send >>>> in a >>>> > pull request or open issues against this github repo. >>>> > >>>> > I would like to solicit feedback from the users, community members, >>>> > committers and PMC members on how this can be incorporated into the >>>> release >>>> > process and AK code base. >>>> > >>>> > My initial thoughts are to include the link to this resource or its >>>> > modified form as part of the release candidate announcement to >>>> encourage >>>> > users to participate in the RC validation process. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks in advance for your participation. >>>> > >>>> > *Process Simplification - Community Validation of Kafka Release >>>> Candidates* >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9861 >>>> > >>>> > *Github Repository Accompanying this Tutorial* >>>> > https://github.com/izzyacademy/apache-kafka-release-party >>>> > >>>> > *YouTube Video Explaining the Resources and How to Use It* >>>> > https://youtu.be/T1VqFszLuQs >>>> > >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "kafka-clients" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to kafka-clients+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kafka-clients/CAHn4u3ucrahgCKG8RACpj%2B302dZeYQCKk9LBqvQ_cR4xPzEQKA%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kafka-clients/CAHn4u3ucrahgCKG8RACpj%2B302dZeYQCKk9LBqvQ_cR4xPzEQKA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >>
