Thanks for the feedback, David. On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 4:05 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Israel, > > I am not aware of any apache docker repository. It seems preferable > to keep it in your own repository at this stage. Otherwise, you would > depend on committers/PMC members to update the image which is > not ideal for your project, I suppose. > > Best, > David > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 12:56 PM Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> David >> >> I have one more question: do we have a Docker Hub account where the >> Docker images can be hosted? >> >> I am fine using my personal account but it would be better if it were >> something like apache/kafka:3.1.0-rc2 or just kafka/3.1.0-rc2 instead of >> izzyacademy/kafka:3.1.0-rc2 >> >> I can still use my personal account but it would look better and give >> others opportunities to manage the images as well without depending on my >> personal Docker Hub account >> >> Your initial feedback was great and I am going to trim the prep process >> by prepping some base images to cut down the Docker image build elapsed >> time >> >> Thank you again >> >> Sincerely >> Israel >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:45 PM Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thanks for the feedback David. I really appreciate it. >>> >>> I would work on eliminating some items in the docker container that are >>> not needed and making this as a base image that already has >>> those dependencies pre-baked. >>> >>> That could significantly trim the elapsed time between when they fire up >>> the container and when they can get started with the validation. >>> >>> Let me update this and will share another update again soon. >>> >>> I appreciate this feedback >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:51 AM 'David Jacot' via kafka-clients < >>> kafka-clie...@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Israel, >>>> >>>> Thank you for this initiative. >>>> >>>> The tool seems pretty cool and I think that it could be useful as well. >>>> I >>>> haven't tried it yet though. >>>> >>>> I just watched the video and I found the part which requires to build >>>> the docker container really long, perhaps even longer than the >>>> validation itself (running the test apart). Could we simplify this? >>>> >>>> Automating the validation process is a great and risky thing at the >>>> same time. Imagine if we would introduce a bug in the scripts. We >>>> could all miss an issue in the RC. This is the advantage of our >>>> current, boring and manual process. I feel like we would always >>>> need some sort of manual sanity checks anyway. >>>> >>>> It is hard to say if this will really help to have more people >>>> validating >>>> the release candidates. However, we could advertise it again when >>>> we publish RCs for 3.1.0, by mentioning it in the thread, and see if >>>> it helps folks. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> David >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 2:06 PM Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> Please take a moment to review this and share your thoughts. It would >>>>> be >>>>> great to have more community involvement during release candidate >>>>> validations >>>>> >>>>> I am wondering if this should be split up between the site docs repo >>>>> and >>>>> the core code repo or just in the code repo >>>>> >>>>> Should we include this in future release candidate voting >>>>> notifications to >>>>> the community? >>>>> >>>>> Also do you think we even need this at all? >>>>> >>>>> When you have a moment please let me know >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:18 PM Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Before you Vote for Apache Kafka RCs, Watch This! >>>>> > >>>>> > https://youtu.be/T1VqFszLuQs >>>>> > >>>>> > Hello Kafka Community Members and welcome to the Apache Kafka Release >>>>> > Party! >>>>> > >>>>> > As part of an effort (KAFKA-9861) to get more community participation >>>>> > during release candidate (RC) validations, we have created the >>>>> following >>>>> > steps to hopefully allow more community members to participate >>>>> thoroughly >>>>> > in this validation process prior to casting their votes for specific >>>>> RCs. >>>>> > >>>>> > It is also our hope that more community members will be able to >>>>> > participate in the process as a result. If you have any suggestions >>>>> for >>>>> > improvement or would like to share changes, please feel free to send >>>>> in a >>>>> > pull request or open issues against this github repo. >>>>> > >>>>> > I would like to solicit feedback from the users, community members, >>>>> > committers and PMC members on how this can be incorporated into the >>>>> release >>>>> > process and AK code base. >>>>> > >>>>> > My initial thoughts are to include the link to this resource or its >>>>> > modified form as part of the release candidate announcement to >>>>> encourage >>>>> > users to participate in the RC validation process. >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks in advance for your participation. >>>>> > >>>>> > *Process Simplification - Community Validation of Kafka Release >>>>> Candidates* >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9861 >>>>> > >>>>> > *Github Repository Accompanying this Tutorial* >>>>> > https://github.com/izzyacademy/apache-kafka-release-party >>>>> > >>>>> > *YouTube Video Explaining the Resources and How to Use It* >>>>> > https://youtu.be/T1VqFszLuQs >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "kafka-clients" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to kafka-clients+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kafka-clients/CAHn4u3ucrahgCKG8RACpj%2B302dZeYQCKk9LBqvQ_cR4xPzEQKA%40mail.gmail.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kafka-clients/CAHn4u3ucrahgCKG8RACpj%2B302dZeYQCKk9LBqvQ_cR4xPzEQKA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>>
