Can't say for sure - all of the log for the time frame, I guess -- Oded Arbel m-Wise mobile solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-9-9581711 (116) +972-67-340014 ::.. A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kwok Peng Tuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: DLR request flag? > > > How much more of the logs do you need to see ? > > > Oded Arbel wrote: > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Kwok Peng Tuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>2002-09-19 09:33:56 DLR SMS [SMSC:Digi] [SVC:try] [ACT:] > >>[from:60162735950] [to:000] [flags:0:0:0:0:12] [msg:11:0x00000000/] > >>[udh:0:] > >> > >> > > > >looks ok. > > > > > > > >>That's fine, but in the log file for the bearerbox I get this > >> > >>2002-09-19 09:34:01 [6] DEBUG: Looking for DLR smsc=Digi, ts=263, > >>dst=60162735950, type=1 > >>2002-09-19 09:34:01 [6] DEBUG: DLR not found! > >>2002-09-19 09:34:01 [6] ERROR: SMPP[Digi]: got DLR but > could not find > >>message or was not interested in it > >> > >> > > > >Not sure what this is all about, but SMPP failed to locate > the message it got a delivery report on. w/o more of the logs > I can't say for sure, but my guess is that this is not the > same message as you've sent. > > > > > > > >>I've set up a jsp page for dlr-url to use and I find that the > >>delivery > >>report is always 12. (8+4) ? > >> > >> > >That's correct. for some reason the SMPP driver treaks an > ACK as a combination SMSC_SUCCESS + BUFFERED. I'm not sure if > this is correct, but it doesn't annoy me much, so I haven't > changed that weird behaviour. > > > > > > > > > >>Is it possible that my request for the status of whether the > >>message was > >>ultimately sent is being rejected by the smsc ? > >> > >> > > > >Unlikely. > > > >-- > >Oded Arbel > >m-Wise mobile solutions > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >+972-9-9581711 (116) > >+972-67-340014 > > > >::.. > >"What do you mean, my birth certificate has expired ?!" > > > > > > > > > >
