actually the t637 has a cable ---but did not use it yet.  I am using
bluetooth..and it is great (reliable).
mjh



On 10/16/07, Ben Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Michael, Thanks for your reply.
>
>
> What kind of performance do you see with the T637?
>
>
> What sort of connection are you using?
>
>
> I've found a few others, like the w810i work with the usb data cable that
> comes with the phone, and I ordered a few quad band gsm modems from europe
> to test with.
>
>
> I'm also curious what the performance trade offs are with a phone vs a gsm
> modem. (If anyone on the list has experience, please let me know)
>
>
> thanks,
>
>
> -Ben
>  On Oct 17, 2007, at 2:17 AM, Michael Habashy wrote:
>
> The T637 cellphone works reliably with kannel.
>
> On 10/13/07, Ben Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Hello, I was wodering if anyone out there knows of any tested / working
> > phones or gsm modems that work in the US with the New AT&T/Cingular.
> >
> > I've been scouring the archives and haven't found any working solutions,
> > I only need it to send / receive sms messages, and already have a phone
> > and SIM with cingular.
> > Currently, we're using gnokii-smd + mysql in conjunction with a nokia
> > 5190, but this doesn't seem to be a very reliable solution, as gnokii-smsd
> > looses the connection to mysql on a semi regular basis.
> >
> >
> > Searching online I've found this GSM modem available in the U.S.,
> >  *Multitech AT&T Dual Band GSM/GPRS 850/1900 MHz Wireless Cellular Modem
> > US MTCBA-G-UF2-AWS*
> > *
> > http://www.pcmall.com/pcmall/shop/detail.asp?dpno=646429&Redir=1&description=Multitech-AT&T%20Dual%20Band%20GSM/GPRS%20850/1900%20MHz%20Wireless%20Cellular%20Modem%20US-Wireless%20Modems
> > *
> >
> >
> > but I'm wondering if anyone out there has tested it, or knows of another
> > tested and working setup.
> >
> >
> > Currently we're using ubuntu server 7.04, but we're willing to change
> > the configuration and acquire new hardware in order to get a reliable
> > solution in place.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to