you have well elaborated my case now in this when i stop smsc_id A and then
start send messages by logic they should be queued but bearer-box send (in some
case to maintain it load balance) these messages to smsc_id B why?
________________________________
From: jyotiranjan panda <tell2jy...@gmail.com>
To: adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com>
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:15:04 PM
Subject: Re: Urgent Need Help in SMPP
Please always add users@kannel.org in your mail. Dont send direct mails.
In this way only anyone can help you.
I am just elaborating your case which I understand from your mail like below
group = smsc
smsc-id = A
denied_smsc_id = B
allowed_smsc_id = A
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
group = smsc
smsc-id = B
denied_smsc_id = A
allowed_smsc_id = B
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Now you sent msg1 with smsc-id = A and "smsc A" is not working,
then
As per my knowledge the message will be in Queue as "smsc B" will not allow any
message with smsc-id = A.
Regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:51 PM, adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
For Kannel routing Problem i have testes a case in which i use the 2 SMPP
connections and in both smsc connections i declare denied-smsc-id. After that i
send an msg on the opposite smsc's by logic smsc's should not a accept msg even
its url include the smsc id because i declare denied-smsc-id. But its accepting
all messages why? For testing purpose I a using one PC and drive_smpp located
in test folder assuming that the same behavior will be shown by them when i
deploy them in real scenario. On the other hand the same test case run
successfully when i use fakesmsc. Tell me why? is it true that denied-smsc-id
is
not work with SMPP type of smsc id?.
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: jyotiranjan panda <tell2jy...@gmail.com>
>To: adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com>
>Cc: users@kannel.org
>Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 3:54:49 PM
>
>Subject: Re: Urgent Need Help in SMPP
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>
>for the priority problem:
>
>
>
>If you are giving priority parameter in kannel, then it just put this value in
>priority_flag of submit_sm pdu of smpp.
>So, dont expect if there is a Qeue of 100 msg's and you send a 0 priority
>message, it will jump this queue and reach smsc premises.
>After that its SMSc's role to deliver it by looking this parameter, and
>sometimes smsc's does not do it as they are not bound to do it.
>
>
>Kannel routing problem:
>Looking on your config it seems ok, just try with commenting denied-smsc-id.
>Be sure that you are sending the message with smsc-id from behind, then only
>this routing mechanism will work.
>
>
>Regards
>Jyoti Ranjan Panda
>
>On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:38 PM, adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I hereby enclose the configuration file please find attachment and give me
>>the
>>solution of my problems.
>>
>>
________________________________
From: jyotiranjan panda <tell2jy...@gmail.com>
>>To: adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com>
>>Cc: users@kannel.org
>>Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 12:17:44 PM
>>Subject: Re: Urgent Need Help in SMPP
>>
>>
>>
>>Can you send your kannel config that you are using to solve below issues.
>>I think there is some configurational problem.
>>
>>Regards
>>Jyoti Ranjan Panda
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>Please can any one tell me that how can i extract SMPP code from kannel. I
>>want
>>to develop my own application using SMPP i want this because of following
>>reasons:
>>>1. In existing kannel i am unable to give high priority to the massages
>>>already
>>>in queue i have also used (0-3) priority but still its behavior is same.
>>>2. Also existing kannel route the massage to any SMSC in multiple SMSC
>>>environment. I have tried to use "denied-smsc-id" but still when one SMSC
>>>goes
>>>down (means not responding but not alive ) kannel route message to the
>>>other
>>>SMSC.
>>>
>>>So that is why i want to extract SMPP module from kannel so guide me how can
>>>i
>>>do this i am new on kannel source code. Also if you have any other solution
>>>then
>>>tell me but reply as soon as possible.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Adil
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
