It only sends 1 (large) part through smsbox. Sms message is splitted in bearerbox.
-----Original Message----- From: zerk...@googlemail.com [mailto:zerk...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Ivan Kurnosov Sent: Wednesday, 15 September, 2010 23:57 To: Rene Kluwen; users@kannel.org Subject: Re: registered_delivery and multi-parts message It sends N sms parts through smsbox and there is no guarantee that all of them will be delivered succesfully On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> wrote: > Because Kannel sends the complete sms message through to smsbox. So it only > needs 1 DLR. > > == Rene > > -----Original Message----- > From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf > Of Ivan Kurnosov > Sent: Wednesday, 15 September, 2010 14:43 > To: users@kannel.org > Subject: Re: registered_delivery and multi-parts message > > Why don't Kannel send DLR request for each part? Each part has its own > message_id and can be unique identified. > >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> > wrote: >>> True, it's a Kannel thing, not an smpp spec issue. >>> What you did probably won't break Kannel... but... you might get some log >>> messages where Kannel complains about not being able to find DLR or not >>> interested in it. >>> >>> == Rene >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On > Behalf >>> Of Ivan Kurnosov >>> Sent: Wednesday, 15 September, 2010 14:08 >>> To: Nikos Balkanas; users@kannel.org >>> Subject: Re: registered_delivery and multi-parts message >>> >>> How they can broke it? It is just removing registered_delivery from >>> other messages than 1st >>> >>> 2010/9/15 Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com>: >>>> That's a kannel, not a spec limitation. And these 3 lines of code you >>>> changed propably have broken your kannel. >>>> >>>> BR, >>>> Nikos >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivan Kurnosov" <zer...@zerkms.ru> >>>> To: "Nikos Balkanas" <nbalka...@gmail.com>; <users@kannel.org> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:24 PM >>>> Subject: Re: registered_delivery and multi-parts message >>>> >>>> >>>> Actually, I can ;-) I already fixed kannel (to be clear - i've just >>>> commented 3 lines of code) to send only one DLR msg. So now I get N >>>> delivery messages. >>>> >>>> But I'm very curious - is it just kannel "feature" or some smpp >>>> specification mandatory? I've asked this question because one of my >>>> SMSC (currently i'm working with 3 different companies) does not send >>>> me delivery messages if it is 0x1 just at first and not at second >>>> message. So I need to know whether I need to ask their support to >>>> reconfigure SMSC or make some tricks to get that info >>>> >>>> 2010/9/15 Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> This is a known kannel limitation. In a multpart SMS it will request > DLR >>>>> only for the first part. Nothing you can do about it. >>>>> >>>>> BR, >>>>> Nikos >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivan Kurnosov" <zer...@zerkms.ru> >>>>> To: <users@kannel.org> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:28 AM >>>>> Subject: registered_delivery and multi-parts message >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hello there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why does >>>>>> >>>>>> 2010-09-15 16:26:32 [25217] [6] DEBUG: registered_delivery: 0 = >>>>>> 0x00000000 >>>>>> >>>>>> for second part even though it was 0x1 for first one? >>>>>> >>>>>> Is not it a bug? >>>>>> >>>>>> While reading SMPP v3.4 specification I did not see any >>>>>> recommendations about how to set registered_delivery if there are >>>>>> multiple parts. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov >> > > > > -- > With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov > > > > -- With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov
