Hi Alex, If a custom field is included send_sms, would the value be moved to sent_sms ?
-- Regards Kenny On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri < alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote: > You should add an arbitrary id to your dlr-url, that's the usual way to do > it. > > Hope it helps. > > Alex > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:43 AM, James E <jam...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for your replies. >> >> Is there a way when inserting into the Send_sms table, to match it to the >> DLR in the sent_sms? >> >> At the moment, I see no linking between the MT and DLR in the sent_sms >> table. >> >> Regards, >> J >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri < >> alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> James, >>> >>> No, it doesn't work like that. The DLR message actually comes from the >>> carrier, so it'll insert only the information from that message. You'll get >>> your BINFO on the sent_sms copy of the message you've sent, but not on the >>> DLR's coming from the carrier. You could, however, pass the value you're >>> storing on the BINFO as a parameter on the dlr-url, and that way you'll be >>> able to get it when kannel hits the dlr-url. >>> >>> Hope it helps, >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:10 AM, James E <jam...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am just wondering, if I enter BINFO into the send_sms table, shouldnt >>>> it be carried and inserted into the sent_sms table as well in the DLR info? >>>> >>>> In my attempts it isnt doing this. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> J >>>> >>> >>> >> >
