not on metadata.. i mean adding a new table `field` to both send_sms and
sent_sms


--
Regards
Kenny



On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> on meta-data? Yes indeed.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Kenny <ken.bell...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> If a custom field is included send_sms, would the value be moved to
>> sent_sms ?
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Kenny
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
>> alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You should add an arbitrary id to your dlr-url, that's the usual way to
>>> do it.
>>>
>>> Hope it helps.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:43 AM, James E <jam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your replies.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way when inserting into the Send_sms table, to match it to
>>>> the DLR in the sent_sms?
>>>>
>>>> At the moment, I see no linking between the MT and DLR in the sent_sms
>>>> table.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> J
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
>>>> alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> James,
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it doesn't work like that. The DLR message actually comes from the
>>>>> carrier, so it'll insert only the information from that message. You'll 
>>>>> get
>>>>> your BINFO on the sent_sms copy of the message you've sent, but not on the
>>>>> DLR's coming from the carrier. You could, however, pass the value you're
>>>>> storing on the BINFO as a parameter on the dlr-url, and that way you'll be
>>>>> able to get it when kannel hits the dlr-url.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope it helps,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:10 AM, James E <jam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am just wondering, if I enter BINFO into the send_sms table,
>>>>>> shouldnt it be carried and inserted into the sent_sms table as well in 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> DLR info?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my attempts it isnt doing this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> J
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to