Hi, As of My Knowledge, Kannel updates the dlr as soon as it received the 1st dlr itself. You will see an warning that dlr not found when the 2nd dlr report comes in. Mysql-Databse for dlr.
*Rajeev Krishna* Operations Manager Krishnas Software Technologies www.krishnasoft.in mobile :+91 888 5815 888 Sales :+91 888 5813 888 Support :+91 888 5817 888 On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa < tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not an kannel expert but have you tried below. > > 1. Add both connectivity under single kannel instance. > 2. Give same smsc-id to both connectivity under kannel (smsc-id = xxxx) > > Check if this resolves your issue. > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Joe Power <joe.po...@puca.com> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> I have inherited a working Kannel platform with binds into >> multiple operators. I don't have much experience in configuring Kannel, but >> have seen what works on the existing platform. I have discovered an issue >> we have with multi-part messages from one of the operators we are connected >> to. The operator has 2 SMSCs with a shared SS7 stack (so they are >> effectively clustered as I understand it). As MO messages can come into >> either SMSC we have a separate bind into each one. However, when a >> multi-part MO message comes in, the individual parts can be handled by >> either SMSC. If a one part comes into one SMSC and is sent over its bind >> and the other part comes into the other SMSC and is sent over its bind then >> Kannel, as it is currently configured, won't match the two parts and >> concatenate them. What is currently happening is that Kannel is waiting for >> the other part(s) sent over the other bind and eventually times out and >> sends what it has. My questions are as follows: - >> >> 1> Is it possible to configure Kannel to treat both binds as connected to >> the one "organisation" and concatenate multi-part messages regardless of >> which of the two binds the parts come in on ? >> >> 2> If the above isn't possible, are there any other options to resolve >> the issue ? >> >> 3> What would the config file for such a configuration look like ? >> >> Any help appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Joe. >> >> >
