Inside the lispd.config file I put this address as a map-server/resolver 
address: 193.162.145.50, is that correct?

(I'll check out the lig command)

Kind regards
Daniele

 
On 15/mag/2013, at 12:15, Albert López wrote:

> May be the problem is a firewall. Try to check if you could get an answer 
> using lig. For instance, you could check if you get answer to: lig -m 
> 195.50.116.18 153.16.10.11
> On the other side, you can use wireshark listening to eth0 to see if 
> map-registers are sent and if you receive map-notify.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Albert
> 
> 
> On 05/15/2013 11:10 AM, Daniele wrote:
>> Thanks Albert for the reply, in this moment i temporarily disabled the wifi 
>> interface to isolate the issue. This is the routing table now:
>> 
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
>> 0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0         128.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 
>> lispTun0
>> 0.0.0.0         151.100.122.1   0.0.0.0         UG    100    0        0 eth0
>> 128.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         128.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 
>> lispTun0
>> 151.100.122.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
>> 169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     1000   0        0 eth0
>> 192.168.122.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 
>> virbr0
>> 
>> Now it seems well configured, but i can't ping any EID, and checking in the 
>> lispmon website i don't get any map reply from the London Map Server looking 
>> for my /32 EID. That means I'm not registering..
>> I can only ping my subnet, obviously, since it's directly connected to eth0 
>> interface.
>> 
>> Thanks 
>> Daniele
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 15/mag/2013, at 10:06, Albert López wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Daniele,
>>> 
>>> The interface you should use in the database-mapping structure of the 
>>> configuration file is the one containing the locators. This interface 
>>> should have a public IP address and a gateway assigned.
>>> From the information you have provided, the interface eth0 doesn't have a 
>>> default route assigned. You should assign a default route to the interface 
>>> eth0 with a less priority metric than wlan0 (higher number). 
>>> Let us know if this resolve the problem
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Albert L.
>>> 
>>> On 05/14/2013 07:36 PM, Daniele wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> What does 'ifconfig -a' show now?
>>>> 
>>>> -Lori
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Dear Lori, apparently the interfaces are correctly configured. This is 
>>>> what ifconfig returns while lispd is running (I'd like to use the eth0 
>>>> interface for LISP and the wireless interface to stay connected to the 
>>>> internet):
>>>> 
>>>> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1d:ba:1c:ac:27  
>>>>           inet addr:1 <my public IP>  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
>>>>           inet6 addr: fe80::21d:baff:fe1c:ac27/64 Scope:Link
>>>>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>>>           RX packets:17974 errors:0 dropped:382 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>>           TX packets:5260 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>>           collisions:3 txqueuelen:1000 
>>>>           RX bytes:1757884 (1.7 MB)  TX bytes:228362 (228.3 KB)
>>>>           Interrupt:16 
>>>> 
>>>> lispTun0  Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 
>>>> 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
>>>>           inet addr: <my EID>  P-t-P:153.16.44.120  Mask:255.255.255.255
>>>>           inet6 addr: 2610:d0:ffff:192::1/128 Scope:Global
>>>>           UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING  MTU:1440  Metric:1
>>>>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>>           TX packets:2398 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:500 
>>>>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:168268 (168.2 KB)
>>>> 
>>>> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  
>>>>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>>>>           inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>>>>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>>>>           RX packets:7135 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>>           TX packets:7135 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
>>>>           RX bytes:666361 (666.3 KB)  TX bytes:666361 (666.3 KB)
>>>> 
>>>> virbr0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr c2:f8:64:5d:92:1d  
>>>>           inet addr:192.168.122.1  Bcast:192.168.122.255  
>>>> Mask:255.255.255.0
>>>>           UP BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>>>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
>>>>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>>>> 
>>>> wlan0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:16:ea:25:f1:70  
>>>>           inet addr:10.0.1.31  Bcast:10.0.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>>>>           inet6 addr: fe80::216:eaff:fe25:f170/64 Scope:Link
>>>>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>>>           RX packets:7599 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>>           TX packets:6219 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
>>>>           RX bytes:5640735 (5.6 MB)  TX bytes:1268953 (1.2 MB)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway i can't ping any other LISP site, my EID doesn't appear in the 
>>>> London Map Server, and also my wifi connection stops working. I guess it 
>>>> is due to some conflict in the routing table
>>>> 
>>>> Kernel IP routing table
>>>> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use 
>>>> Iface
>>>> 0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0         128.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 
>>>> lispTun0
>>>> 0.0.0.0         10.0.1.1        0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 
>>>> wlan0
>>>> 10.0.1.0        0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     2      0        0 
>>>> wlan0
>>>> 128.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         128.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 
>>>> lispTun0
>>>> 169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     1000   0        0 
>>>> wlan0
>>>> 192.168.122.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 
>>>> virbr0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Can wifi and LISP interface live together? Do I have to modify manually 
>>>> the routing table?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Daniele
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Contactus-linux mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lispmob.org/mailman/listinfo/contactus-linux
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to