On Sep 5, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Rene Bartsch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 2014-09-03 12:04, schrieb Lori Jakab: >> On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:57 PM, Albert López <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Renne, >>> The RTR boxes are learned through the Map Server using control messages. As >>> far as I know, not all the Map Servers in Beta Network has support of Nat >>> Traversal. You should ask in unicast lo Lori (in CC) to provide you with an >>> EID allocated in one of these Map Servers. >> Rene’s EID is allocated on the European infrastructure which has four >> Map-Servers. Two of the four Map-Servers support NAT-T. They are: >> intouch-ams-mr-ms-1.rloc.lisp4.net (217.8.98.42) and >> intouch-ams-mr-ms-2.rloc.lisp4.net (217.8.98.46). They can also be >> used over IPv6 RLOCs, by substituting lisp4 with lisp6 in the >> hostname. >> HTH, >> -Lori > > With 217.8.98.42 as Map-Server/-Resolver and 193.162.145.46 as "Proxy ETR > address" IPv4 in IPv4 works fine, while IPv6 in IPv4 does not work. Are you configuring both IPv4 and IPv6 EIDs at the same time? I think there is a limitation in the NAT code, that only one EID can be used, although I may be mistaken, as the example configuration file says only one *interface*. I hope someone can confirm that IPv4 and IPv6 can be used at the same time with NAT enabled. Can you try removing the IPv4 EID from the configuration, just to check if it works that way? HTH, -Lori > Although tun0 shows a IPv6 address in OS-Monitor, Firefox and Chrome use IPv4 > (tested with http://www.heise.de/ip and http://ipv6-test.com/). If I switch > the Google Public DNS nameservers in LISPmob from IPv4 to IPv6 addresses DNS > resolution fails. The Log (debug-level 3) looks OK. > > Do you have any idea, why or how to debug this? > > > -- > Best regards, > > Renne
