On 12/11/2016 02:42 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
yes, you're right, i did not see it .. but is this ok to have a versioning number after the os id??On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:34:26 +0200, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:Just based on what you've quoted, I would guess the explicit dependency found in kf5-frameworkintegration on an older Qt 5 version blocks the update. There should be are rebuild in the updates repo, however: kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.2.x86_64.rpm It depends on the Qt 5.6.2 package. Do you see it in the repo? Maybe you are affected by more so-called "broken dependencies"?the thing is that i have it installed : rpm -qa kf5-frameworkintegration kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.x86_64No. That's not the same package I mentioned. Notice the extra ".2" behind ".fc23". That's a minor release update in the least-significant right-most part of the package "Release" tag.
anyway, the problem was solved (fixed packages in updates) .. Thank you! Adrian
Details like that can be _very_ important when examining dependency problems and checking which packages are available in the repo.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
