On Fri, 2024-03-22 at 13:10 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > > [snip]
> For a lot of "public" wifi networks, it's not even a firewall, it's > that > the access points are set to client isolation mode (so the AP only > allows clients to talk to the gateway). It's basically an extra > security layer on their part to keep customer A from causing problems > for customer B. > > So then you do need your own access point/router. On newer Android > devices, you can re-share the wifi with hotspot mode, so don't need > any > additional equipment. > -- > Chris Adams <li...@cmadams.net> > -- Yikes. I just looked that up. https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/16751/wireless-client-isolation-how-does-it-work-and-can-it-be-bypassed https://medium.com/@dd.identity/wireless-guest-network-client-isolation-under-the-hood-d0698333cbcc Not something I could get around sitting in a hotel room. The solution I mentioned about using port 80 for ssh was something I used when I was at a conference in DC and the host only allowed http/https traffic to machines outside the building. I used it to ssh to a machine that was outside, so it wasn't like this case of trying to get two machines behind the firewall together... billo -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
