On 05/14/11 12:36, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote: > >> On Fedora Machine: >> # /bin/netstat -rn >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt >> Iface >> 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 >> eth0 >> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 >> wlan0 >> 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 >> eth0 >> 192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 >> virbr0 >> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 >> wlan0 >> >> > ... > >> On Fedora machine: >> >> # /sbin/ifconfig >> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:0D:15:2B:9E >> inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 >> inet6 addr: fe80::203:dff:fe15:2b9e/64 Scope:Link >> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:1340 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> TX packets:849 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >> RX bytes:174589 (170.4 KiB) TX bytes:418153 (408.3 KiB) >> Interrupt:19 Base address:0xd800 >> >> eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:0D:15:2B:9E >> inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 >> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> Interrupt:19 Base address:0xd800 >> > > .. > >> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:34:56:00:03:43 >> inet6 addr: fe80::234:56ff:fe00:343/64 Scope:Link >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:4976669 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> TX packets:4947232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >> RX bytes:1062494718 (1013.2 MiB) TX bytes:500756007 (477.5 MiB) >> >> wlan0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:34:56:00:03:43 >> inet addr:192.168.1.108 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> >> > > 1) Something looks odd here - the netstat above seems to show eth0 > have 10.0.x.x and wlan0 being on 10.1.x.x. > > The ifconfig has > > eth0 on 10.1.1.1 and a second IP of 10.0.0.1 > wlan0 has IP6 address + 192.168.1.108 > > 2) This looks a bit strange - notwithstanding that, it has no > interfaces which respond to 192.168.1.1 ... is this the right machine ? > > If not - and you want it to respond to 192.168.1.1 you should have > that configured on at least one interface ... no? > > The eth0 is not active. It is configured with a static IP, but it is disconnected. Ditto on the PowerBook machine. It is configured with a static IP but is is disconnected, so the ether links on both machines is down. Only the wireless is active.
I do not understand why you say I have an IP6 address. the LAN is on IP4 addresses. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines