Am 17.02.2013 22:35, schrieb jonc: > It's my understanding that Fedora's primary role is to evaluate and explore > software for Red Hat, not necessarily > to produce a stable consumer-level product. That's very much Ubuntu's > mission, but it isn't Fedora's. I expect > Ubuntu not to break. I expect Fedora to break. Oddly, in my own experience, > they both break about the same amount.
i expect NO DISTRIBUTION to break if a distribution breaks repeatly the development process is broken and fedoras is broken since some releases there are feautres accepted for rawhide while work is going on in the current release, there is not time to settle, there is always rush to invent the next whell instead try to get the current one running round this way of software development will not lead in stable software you can guess why opens ource software like apache is taht stable and relieable: becasue they do not try to re.invent the wheel every few months and no, settle doe snot mean stop development it does mean think and plan BEFORE development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
