On 12/13/2013 10:43 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
Rich,
The behavior is a little bit different and I will try to explain:
version: 389-Directory/1.2.11.25 <http://1.2.11.25> B2013.347.1221
389DS <--> Windows 2008 R2
Name of group: GSG_TESTE
Included a lot of users on this group, including this user:
DN of the user on windows: CN=Alberto Viana,OU=TESTE,DC=homolog,DC=rnp
DN of the user on 389DS: uid=alberto.viana,ou=TESTE,dc=homolog,dc=rnp
What I did:
Changeg the OU of the user via windows to:
NEW DN: CN=Alberto Viana,OU=NEW,DC=homolog,DC=rnp
What happenned:
Did not deleted all users from the group.
389DS moved correctly the user to new DN:
uid=alberto.viana,ou=NEW,dc=homolog,dc=rnp
389DS Added this new uid (uid=alberto.viana,ou=NEW,dc=homolog,dc=rnp)
to group, but keep the old entry too
(uid=alberto.viana,ou=TESTE,dc=homolog,dc=rnp).
Whe I remove the old entry manually
(uid=alberto.viana,ou=TESTE,dc=homolog,dc=rnp) from the group, 389 DS
deletes all users from the group on both sides (389DS and windows)
Do need any specific information? should I file a ticket?
Yes.
I also have a third 389DS running version 1.3.2.6 with a similar
behavior to 1.2.10.12 (as I described in my first email)
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com
<mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 12/12/2013 12:15 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
Rich,
but in my case, the new OU is not ou of my scope. The sync
deleted all of my users from my group (I think that I didnt make
myself clear enough and you thought that users were deleted from
389DS) on both sides and just keep the user that I changed from
windows side.
So just make sure that you can undestand my problem. I Have a
group named GRP_TEST and in this group i have a lot of users.
When I change the OU of one of theses users, the sync delete all
users from this group oh both sides (windows and 389DS) and just
keep the user that I modified the OU.
Am I clear enough?
Yes. If you can reproduce the issue with 1.2.11, please file a
ticket.
Thanks
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Rich Megginson
<rmegg...@redhat.com <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 12/12/2013 11:55 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
I found the root cause, it's happens when I change a user
from one OU to another on my windows side.
Is that an expected behavior?
sounds like https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/355
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Alberto Viana
<alberto...@gmail.com <mailto:alberto...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have 2 389 DS with multimaster replicaton and one of
them replicating (multimaster) with my AD server
389DS2 <--> 389DS1 <--> ADServer
389-Directory/1.2.10.12 <http://1.2.10.12>
AD Server 2008 R2
With 2 specific groups, for some reason that could not
identify in my logs, all members are deleted (i'm not
sure if the root cause is the 389DS or my AD).
Can someone take a look on my log file and point me what
is going on?
I dont want to send my log to the list because that a
lot of information of my users. Can I send direct to
someone?
Thanks a lot
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
