I don't know, as I did not build the flatpak nor use it myself. The flatpak would need to bundle the plugins, of course (as flatpaks bundle everything else as well). I guess that still needs to be tested as well as if it was possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7 at all.
Regards, Dominic On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:56 AM Lex Trotman via Users <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 16:21, Dominic Hopf via Users > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Also, you did not come back to my point on installing a flatpak instead. > If it was possible for you to follow instructions like e.g. these ones that > would be great: > > > > https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-install-flatpak-on-centos > > > > Regards, > > Dominic > > Does the flatpack work with the plugins? (which was where we started). > > Cheers > Lex > > > > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:16 AM Dominic Hopf <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can you > check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS > 7 machine and what the package name is? > >> If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in the > Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same > package available, but I can try, at least. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Dominic > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: > >>> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >> On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: > >>> >>> I accidently took us off list, added us back. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>>> So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the > problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language > features is required. > >>> >>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) > >>> >>>> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) > >>> >>>> > >>> >>> Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla > >>> >>> versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the > >>> >>> changes between the old version and the new versions (two major > >>> >>> versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to > support > >>> >>> both. > >>> >>> > >>> >>>> I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort > unless anyone else has an idea? > >>> >>>> Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on > CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then? > >>> >>>> > >>> >>> Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms > >>> >>> would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer > >>> >>> runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI > now. > >>> >>> Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime > >>> >>> library was available I guess. But I am no container expert. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Cheers > >>> >>> Lex > >>> >>> > >>> >>>> Regards, > >>> >>>> Dominic > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>>>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>>>>> No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading > here as well. ;) > >>> >>>>>> I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, > but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though. > >>> >>>>>> I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can > tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update. > >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>>>> Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there > won't be > >>> >>>>> much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is. > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Cheers > >>> >>>>> Lex > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>> Regards, > >>> >>>>>> Dominic > >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>>>>>>> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into > this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS > 7. > >>> >>>>>>> You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being > pragmatic ;-P > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC > maintenance > >>> >>>>>>> updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 > or 1.39 > >>> >>>>>>> doesn't seem likely to happen. > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what > Github CI > >>> >>>>>>> uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info > about > >>> >>>>>>> what failed we can't do much. > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> Cheers > >>> >>>>>>> Lex > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>> >>>>>>>> Users mailing list -- [email protected] > >>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > >>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>> >>>>>>> Users mailing list -- [email protected] > >>> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> >>> Users mailing list -- [email protected] > >>> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > >>> >> But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/html-single/user_guide/index#sect-GCC-CPP-Compatibility. > Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset > installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer > Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20? > >>> > "Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for developers on > the > >>> > Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for Centos 7, > >>> > and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 repository? > >>> > > >>> > Cheers > >>> > Lex > >>> > > >>> >> If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement > can be met? > >>> Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system. > CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for > software to be downloaded. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Users mailing list -- [email protected] > >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
