On June 21, 2023 3:51:44 AM EDT, Lex Trotman via Users <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 17:06, Dominic Hopf <[email protected]> >wrote: >> >> I don't know, as I did not build the flatpak nor use it myself. > >Seems like flathub doesn't list who maintains it, AFAICT, so could be >anybody, competence unknown. IIRC kugel- identified some issues >relating to flatpacking Geany, not sure if thats solved or not. > >> The flatpak would need to bundle the plugins, of course (as flatpaks >bundle everything else as well). > >Ok, thats not the flathub one AFAICT. > >> I guess that still needs to be tested as well as if it was possible >to install flatpaks on CentOS 7 at all. > >Google says its possible https://flatpak.org/setup/CentOS ... in fact >built-in. > >Cheers >Lex > >> >> Regards, >> Dominic >> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:56 AM Lex Trotman via Users ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 16:21, Dominic Hopf via Users >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Also, you did not come back to my point on installing a flatpak >instead. If it was possible for you to follow instructions like e.g. >these ones that would be great: >>> > >>> > https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-install-flatpak-on-centos >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Dominic >>> >>> Does the flatpack work with the plugins? (which was where we >started). >>> >>> Cheers >>> Lex >>> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:16 AM Dominic Hopf ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can >you check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on >your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is? >>> >> If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in >the Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have >the same package available, but I can try, at least. >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> Dominic >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: >>> >>> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >> On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: >>> >>> >>> I accidently took us off list, added us back. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right >now the problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message: >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 >language features is required. >>> >>> >>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 >(%build) >>> >>> >>>> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, >Scintilla >>> >>> >>> versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, >and the >>> >>> >>> changes between the old version and the new versions (two >major >>> >>> >>> versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to >support >>> >>> >>> both. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense >effort unless anyone else has an idea? >>> >>> >>>> Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install >flatpaks on CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then? >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised >mechanisms >>> >>> >>> would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against >a newer >>> >>> >>> runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles >and CI now. >>> >>> >>> Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ >runtime >>> >>> >>> library was available I guess. But I am no container >expert. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> >>> Lex >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Regards, >>> >>> >>>> Dominic >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm >reading here as well. ;) >>> >>> >>>>>> I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for >CentOS 7, but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though. >>> >>> >>>>>> I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either >I can tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update. >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess >there won't be >>> >>> >>>>> much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is. >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> Cheers >>> >>> >>>>> Lex >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> Regards, >>> >>> >>>>>> Dominic >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look >into this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available >for CentOS 7. >>> >>> >>>>>>> You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being >pragmatic ;-P >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC >maintenance >>> >>> >>>>>>> updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so >1.38 or 1.39 >>> >>> >>>>>>> doesn't seem likely to happen. >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is >what Github CI >>> >>> >>>>>>> uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any >info about >>> >>> >>>>>>> what failed we can't do much. >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>> >>> >>>>>>> Lex >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>>>>>>> Users mailing list -- [email protected] >>> >>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >[email protected] >>> >>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>>>>>> Users mailing list -- [email protected] >>> >>> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >[email protected] >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> Users mailing list -- [email protected] >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >>> >>> >> But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? >See >https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/html-single/user_guide/index#sect-GCC-CPP-Compatibility. >Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset >installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, >Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20? >>> >>> > "Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for >developers on the >>> >>> > Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for >Centos 7, >>> >>> > and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 >repository? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Cheers >>> >>> > Lex >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler >requirement can be met? >>> >>> Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system. >CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for >software to be downloaded. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Users mailing list -- [email protected] >>> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Users mailing list -- [email protected] >>> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list -- [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >_______________________________________________ >Users mailing list -- [email protected] >To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Please, no flatpak... _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
