Hi Dino, On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MakeTuple has been moved into PythonOps as PythonOps.MakeTuple. The reason > for that change is that we now want the public surface area of the .NET > Python types to match the public surface area Python types.
Sounds good. > > File is more of a problem... Unfortunately files do need to be bound to a > context (for multi-runtime support). If there's enough demand for it we > could provide a PythonEngine class which is compatible w/ 1.x and we could > expose the file creation via that. Until then probably the only way to do it > right now is to call __builtin__.file through Python code (to which you can > pass in a stream). The ObjectOperations class should make that fairly easy > (you can convert file to a delegate and then call it). That's actually what I thought when I was trying to sleep last night :). It's certainly acceptable, and I'm not sure using Streams as files will be all that common anyway, but it seems that it could hang off of ScriptEngine (i.e. engine.MakeFile(Stream)). However, I don't know how applicable that we be to other languages (it's been a while since I used Ruby). If you can think of a place to put it, great; if not, I won't lose any (more) sleep over it. Aside: I like the new ObjectOperations class. It makes a lot of the stuff I have to do for NWSGI much easier. All of the new hosting APIs are very nice to work with. Thanks for your help, Dino. -Jeff > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:17 PM > To: Discussion of IronPython > Subject: [IronPython] 2.0B1 Hosting: Creating Python Types > > Hi, > I'm trying to figure out how to create an instance of a Python type > (i.e. tuple and file) using the hosting interface (from C#). In older > versions there was PythonTuple.MakeTuple, for example, but that seems > to have disappeared. Now PythonTuple and PythonFile both require a > CodeContext, which I'm pretty sure is internal. > > Is there a nice, easy way in 2.0B1 to create a tuple and convert a > Stream to a file-like object? > > Thanks, > Jeff > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
