On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Dino Viehland <di...@microsoft.com> wrote: > My initial test job didn't include support for __unicode__ on old-style > classes or have the fix for exceptions. I'm sending it through again to make > sure those two changes didn't break anything else. But I'm inclined to say > that this change is for the better. Thoughts?
How does the implementation work? Does always it prefer __unicode__ to __str__, or does it only call __unicode__ if it is present and __str__ is missing? - Jeff _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
