On 24.08.2009 13:58 Uhr, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> You can still use one interface though - MI is fully available and does
> (pseudo) async xmlrpc commands.
that is not true if you use modules from both s and k (like domain
domain module, for example, that is much more advanced in s).
ok, I see. Solutions:
- stress Andrei and/or other RPC devels :-)
- add missing/needed MI commands to s modules
I am considering merging sl module -- seems to be one preventing using
easy some modules from both sides.
besides, s xmlrpc interface is much better that k's, because it each
call executes a config file route block, that allows (among other things)
access control.
With this one I agree.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* http://www.asipto.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
