Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: > What I don't understand is the reasons to make current SR working with > K and S features/modules compatibility. We don't need a SR working > solution right now (since Kamailio and SER do exist), do we?. Wouldn't > be better to spent devel time in porting the required K/S modules to > SR instead of making them working as K/S modules in any way?
this is exactly how i also like it to be and which was discussed a couple of months ago on the mailing list. i would have liked to have sip-router, not k or s version of it, but officially it didn't go that way. -- juha _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
