I would be leery of the hard-coded stuff. Reason: the IPv6 code has been a continual source of trouble, while the IPv4 code has worked quite well.
Could be a lot of reasons, especially the fact that the IPv6 code is hardly exercised by the devel team...so changes that cause problems are rarely detected right away. :-) On Dec 2, 2009, at 5:25 PM, kevin.buck...@ecs.vuw.ac.nz wrote: >> I believe this line is incorrect: >> >>> opal_list_append(&opal_if_list, (opal_list_item_t*) >>> intf_ptr); >> >> It needs to be >> >> opal_list_append(&opal_if_list, &intf_ptr->super); > > Didn't seem to change things. > > Any thoughts on the: > > /* > * hardcoded netmask, adrian says that's ok > */ > intf.if_mask = 64; > intf.if_flags = cur_ifaddrs->ifa_flags; > > which I simply copied over from the IPv6 block? > > I note that the "non-NetBSD" inet stuff does something a bit more > convoluted, vis: > > /* generate CIDR and assign to netmask */ > intf.if_mask = prefix(((struct sockaddr_in*) > &ifr->ifr_addr)->sin_addr.s_addr); > > > -- > Kevin M. Buckley Room: CO327 > School of Engineering and Phone: +64 4 463 5971 > Computer Science > Victoria University of Wellington > New Zealand > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
