Hi,

Am 14.02.2011 um 04:54 schrieb Tena Sakai:

> I have digressed and started downward descent...
> 
> I was trying to make a simple and clear case.  Everything
> I write in this very mail is about local machines.  There
> is no virtual machines involved.  I am talking about two
> machines, vixen and dasher, which share the same file
> structure.  Vixen is a nfs server and dasher is an nfs
> client.  I have just installed openmpi 1.4.3 on dasher,
> which is the same version I have on vixen.
> 
> I have a file app.ac3, which looks like:
>  [tsakai@vixen Rmpi]$ cat app.ac3
>  -H dasher.egcrc.org  -np 1 hostname
>  -H dasher.egcrc.org  -np 1 hostname
>  -H vixen.egcrc.org   -np 1 hostname
>  -H vixen.egcrc.org   -np 1 hostname
>  [tsakai@vixen Rmpi]$
> 
> Vixen can run this without any problem:
>  [tsakai@vixen Rmpi]$ mpirun -app app.ac3
>  vixen.egcrc.org
>  vixen.egcrc.org
>  dasher.egcrc.org
>  dasher.egcrc.org
>  [tsakai@vixen Rmpi]$
> 
> But I can't run this very command from dasher:
>  [tsakai@vixen Rmpi]$
>  [tsakai@vixen Rmpi]$ ssh dasher
>  Last login: Sun Feb 13 19:26:57 2011 from vixen.egcrc.org
>  [tsakai@dasher ~]$
>  [tsakai@dasher ~]$ cd Notes/R/parallel/Rmpi/
>  [tsakai@dasher Rmpi]$
>  [tsakai@dasher Rmpi]$ mpirun -app app.ac3
>  mpirun: killing job...

a) can you ssh from dasher to vixen?

b) firewall on vixen?

-- Reuti


>  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the process
>  that caused that situation.
>  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  mpirun was unable to cleanly terminate the daemons on the nodes shown
>  below. Additional manual cleanup may be required - please refer to
>  the "orte-clean" tool for assistance.
>  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>        vixen.egcrc.org - daemon did not report back when launched
>  [tsakai@dasher Rmpi]$
> 
> After I issue the mpirun command, it hangs and I had to Cntrol-C out
> of it at which point it generated all lines " mpirun: killing job..."
> and below.
> 
> A strange thing is that dahser has no problem executing the same
> thing via ssh:
>  [tsakai@dasher Rmpi]$ ssh vixen.egcrc.org hostname
>  vixen.egcrc.org
>  [tsakai@dasher Rmpi]$
> 
> In fact, dasher can run it via mpirun so long as no foreign machine
> is present in the app file.  Ie.,
>  [tsakai@dasher Rmpi]$ cat app.ac4
>  -H dasher.egcrc.org  -np 1 hostname
>  -H dasher.egcrc.org  -np 1 hostname
>  # -H vixen.egcrc.org   -np 1 hostname
>  # -H vixen.egcrc.org   -np 1 hostname
>  [tsakai@dasher Rmpi]$
>  [tsakai@dasher Rmpi]$ mpirun -app app.ac4
>  dasher.egcrc.org
>  dasher.egcrc.org
>  [tsakai@dasher Rmpi]$
> 
> Can you please tell me why I can go one way (from vixen to dasher)
> and not the other way (dasher to vixen)?
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Tena
> 
> 
> On 2/12/11 9:42 PM, "Gustavo Correa" <g...@ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Tena
>> 
>> Thank you for taking the time to explain the details of
>> the EC2 procedure.
>> 
>> I am afraid everything in my bag of tricks was used.
>> As Ralph and Jeff suggested, this seems to be a very specific
>> problem with EC2.
>> 
>> The difference in behavior when you run as root vs. when you
>> run as Tena, tells that there is some use restriction to regular users
>> in EC2 that isn't present in common machines (Linux or other), I guess.
>> This may be yet another  'stone to turn', as you like to say.
>> It also suggests that there is nothing wrong in principle with your
>> openMPI setup or with your program, otherwise root would not be able to run
>> it.
>> 
>> Besides Ralph suggestion of trying the EC2 mailing list archive,
>> I wonder if EC2 has any type of user support where you could ask
>> for help.
>> After all, it is a paid sevice, isn't it?
>> (OpenMPI is not paid and has a great customer service, doesn't it?  :) )
>> You have a well documented case to present,
>> and the very peculiar fact that the program fails for normal users but runs
>> for root.
>> This should help the EC2 support to start looking for a solution.
>> 
>> I am running out of suggestions of what you could try on your own.
>> But let me try:
>> 
>> 1) You may try to reduce the problem to its less common denominator,
>> perhaps by trying to run non-R based MPI programs on EC2, maybe the 
>> hello_c.c,
>> ring_c.c, and connectivity_c.c programs in the OpenMPi examples directory.
>> This would be to avoid the extra layer of complexity introduced by R.
>> Even simpler would be to run 'hostname' with mpiexec (mpiexec -np 2 
>> hostname).
>> I.e. go in a progression of increasing complexity, see where you hit the 
>> wall.
>> This may shed some light on what is going on.
>> 
>> I don't know if this suggestion may  really help, though.
>> It is not clear to me where the thing fails, whether it is during program
>> execution,
>> or while mpiexec is setting up the environment for the program to run.
>> If it is very early in the process, before the program starts, my suggestion
>> won't work.
>> Jeff and Ralph, who know OpenMPI inside out, may have better advice in this
>> regard.
>> 
>> 2) Another thing would be to try to run R on E2C in serial mode, without
>> mpiexec,
>> interactively or via script, to see who EC2 doesn't like: R or OpenMPI (but
>> maybe it's both).
>> 
>> Gus Correa
>> 
>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Tena Sakai wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Gus,
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your tips.
>>> 
>>> I didn't find any smoking gun or anything comes close.
>>> Here's the upshot:
>>> 
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$ ulimit -a
>>> core file size          (blocks, -c) 0
>>> data seg size           (kbytes, -d) unlimited
>>> scheduling priority             (-e) 0
>>> file size               (blocks, -f) unlimited
>>> pending signals                 (-i) 61504
>>> max locked memory       (kbytes, -l) 32
>>> max memory size         (kbytes, -m) unlimited
>>> open files                      (-n) 1024
>>> pipe size            (512 bytes, -p) 8
>>> POSIX message queues     (bytes, -q) 819200
>>> real-time priority              (-r) 0
>>> stack size              (kbytes, -s) 8192
>>> cpu time               (seconds, -t) unlimited
>>> max user processes              (-u) 61504
>>> virtual memory          (kbytes, -v) unlimited
>>> file locks                      (-x) unlimited
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$ sudo su
>>> bash-3.2#
>>> bash-3.2# ulimit -a
>>> core file size          (blocks, -c) 0
>>> data seg size           (kbytes, -d) unlimited
>>> scheduling priority             (-e) 0
>>> file size               (blocks, -f) unlimited
>>> pending signals                 (-i) 61504
>>> max locked memory       (kbytes, -l) 32
>>> max memory size         (kbytes, -m) unlimited
>>> open files                      (-n) 1024
>>> pipe size            (512 bytes, -p) 8
>>> POSIX message queues     (bytes, -q) 819200
>>> real-time priority              (-r) 0
>>> stack size              (kbytes, -s) 8192
>>> cpu time               (seconds, -t) unlimited
>>> max user processes              (-u) unlimited
>>> virtual memory          (kbytes, -v) unlimited
>>> file locks                      (-x) unlimited
>>> bash-3.2#
>>> bash-3.2#
>>> bash-3.2# ulimit -a > root_ulimit-a
>>> bash-3.2# exit
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$ ulimit -a > tsakai_ulimit-a
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$ diff root_ulimit-a tsakai_ulimit-a
>>> 14c14
>>> < max user processes              (-u) unlimited
>>> ---
>>>> max user processes              (-u) 61504
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$ cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
>>> /proc/sys/fs/file-max
>>> 480     0       762674
>>> 762674
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$ sudo su
>>> bash-3.2#
>>> bash-3.2# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr /proc/sys/fs/file-max
>>> 512     0       762674
>>> 762674
>>> bash-3.2# exit
>>> exit
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$ sysctl -a |grep fs.file-max
>>> -bash: sysctl: command not found
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$ /sbin/!!
>>> /sbin/sysctl -a |grep fs.file-max
>>> error: permission denied on key 'kernel.cad_pid'
>>> error: permission denied on key 'kernel.cap-bound'
>>> fs.file-max = 762674
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$ sudo /sbin/sysctl -a | grep fs.file-max
>>> fs.file-max = 762674
>>> [tsakai@ip-10-114-239-188 ~]$
>>> 
>>> I see a bit of difference between root and tsakai, but I cannot
>>> believe such small difference results in somewhat a catastrophic
>>> failure as I have reported.  Would you agree with me?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Tena
>>> 
>>> On 2/11/11 6:06 PM, "Gus Correa" <g...@ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Tena
>>>> 
>>>> Please read one answer inline.
>>>> 
>>>> Tena Sakai wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>> Hi Gus,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for your replies.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have pretty much ruled out PATH issues by setting tsakai's PATH
>>>>> as identical to that of root.  In that setting I reproduced the
>>>>> same result as before: root can run mpirun correctly and tsakai
>>>>> cannot.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have also checked out permission on /tmp directory.  tsakai has
>>>>> no problem creating files under /tmp.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am trying to come up with a strategy to show that each and every
>>>>> programs in the PATH has "world" executable permission.  It is a
>>>>> stone to turn over, but I am not holding my breath.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> ... you are running out of file descriptors. Are file descriptors
>>>>>> limited on a per-process basis, perchance?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have never heard there is such restriction on Amazon EC2.  There
>>>>> are folks who keep running instances for a long, long time.  Whereas
>>>>> in my case, I launch 2 instances, check things out, and then turn
>>>>> the instances off.  (Given that the state of California has a huge
>>>>> debts, our funding is very tight.)  So, I really doubt that's the
>>>>> case.  I have run mpirun unsuccessfully as user tsakai and immediately
>>>>> after successfully as root.  Still, I would be happy if you can tell
>>>>> me a way to tell number of file descriptors used or remmain.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Your mentioned file descriptors made me think of something under
>>>>> /dev.  But I don't know exactly what I am fishing.  Do you have
>>>>> some suggestions?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 1) If the environment has anything to do with Linux,
>>>> check:
>>>> 
>>>> cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr /proc/sys/fs/file-max
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> or
>>>> 
>>>> sysctl -a |grep fs.file-max
>>>> 
>>>> This max can be set (fs.file-max=whatever_is_reasonable)
>>>> in /etc/sysctl.conf
>>>> 
>>>> See 'man sysctl' and 'man sysctl.conf'
>>>> 
>>>> 2) Another possible source of limits.
>>>> 
>>>> Check "ulimit -a" (bash) or "limit" (tcsh).
>>>> 
>>>> If you need to change look at:
>>>> 
>>>> /etc/security/limits.conf
>>>> 
>>>> (See also 'man limits.conf')
>>>> 
>>>> **
>>>> 
>>>> Since "root can but Tena cannot",
>>>> I would check 2) first,
>>>> as they are the 'per user/per group' limits,
>>>> whereas 1) is kernel/system-wise.
>>>> 
>>>> I hope this helps,
>>>> Gus Correa
>>>> 
>>>> PS - I know you are a wise and careful programmer,
>>>> but here we had cases of programs that would
>>>> fail because of too many files that were open and never closed,
>>>> eventually exceeding the max available/permissible.
>>>> So, it does happen.
>>>> 
>>>>> I wish I could reproduce this (weired) behavior on a different
>>>>> set of machines.  I certainly cannot in my local environment.  Sigh!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tena
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2/11/11 3:17 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> It is concerning if the pipe system call fails - I can't think of why 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> would happen. Thats not usually a permissions issue but rather a deeper
>>>>>> indication that something is either seriously wrong on your system or you
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> running out of file descriptors. Are file descriptors limited on a
>>>>>> per-process
>>>>>> basis, perchance?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my PDA. No type good.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:08 AM, "Gus Correa" <g...@ldeo.columbia.edu> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Tena
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Since root can but you can't,
>>>>>>> is is a directory permission problem perhaps?
>>>>>>> Check the execution directory permission (on both machines,
>>>>>>> if this is not NFS mounted dir).
>>>>>>> I am not sure, but IIRR OpenMPI also uses /tmp for
>>>>>>> under-the-hood stuff, worth checking permissions there also.
>>>>>>> Just a naive guess.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Congrats for all the progress with the cloudy MPI!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Gus Correa
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tena Sakai wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> I have made a bit more progress.  I think I can say ssh authenti-
>>>>>>>> cation problem is behind me now.  I am still having a problem running
>>>>>>>> mpirun, but the latest discovery, which I can reproduce, is that
>>>>>>>> I can run mpirun as root.  Here's the session log:
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@vixen ec2]$ 2ec2 ec2-184-73-104-242.compute-1.amazonaws.com
>>>>>>>> Last login: Fri Feb 11 00:41:11 2011 from 10.100.243.195
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ ll
>>>>>>>> total 8
>>>>>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 tsakai tsakai 274 Feb 11 00:47 app.ac
>>>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 tsakai tsakai 379 Feb 11 00:48 fib.R
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ ll .ssh
>>>>>>>> total 16
>>>>>>>> -rw------- 1 tsakai tsakai  232 Feb  5 23:19 authorized_keys
>>>>>>>> -rw------- 1 tsakai tsakai  102 Feb 11 00:34 config
>>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 tsakai tsakai 1302 Feb 11 00:36 known_hosts
>>>>>>>> -rw------- 1 tsakai tsakai  887 Feb  8 22:03 tsakai
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ ssh ip-10-100-243-195.ec2.internal
>>>>>>>> Last login: Fri Feb 11 00:36:20 2011 from 10.195.198.31
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$ # I am on machine B
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$ hostname
>>>>>>>> ip-10-100-243-195
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$ ll
>>>>>>>> total 8
>>>>>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 tsakai tsakai 274 Feb 11 00:44 app.ac
>>>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 tsakai tsakai 379 Feb 11 00:47 fib.R
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$ cat app.ac
>>>>>>>> -H ip-10-195-198-31.ec2.internal -np 1 Rscript /home/tsakai/fib.R 5
>>>>>>>> -H ip-10-195-198-31.ec2.internal -np 1 Rscript /home/tsakai/fib.R 6
>>>>>>>> -H ip-10-100-243-195.ec2.internal -np 1 Rscript /home/tsakai/fib.R 7
>>>>>>>> -H ip-10-100-243-195.ec2.internal -np 1 Rscript /home/tsakai/fib.R 8
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$ # go back to machine A
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-100-243-195 ~]$ exit
>>>>>>>> logout
>>>>>>>> Connection to ip-10-100-243-195.ec2.internal closed.
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ hostname
>>>>>>>> ip-10-195-198-31
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ # Execute mpirun
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ mpirun -app app.ac
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> mpirun was unable to launch the specified application as it encountered
>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> error:
>>>>>>>> Error: pipe function call failed when setting up I/O forwarding
>>>>>>>> subsystem
>>>>>>>> Node: ip-10-195-198-31
>>>>>>>> while attempting to start process rank 0.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ # try it as root
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ sudo su
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2#
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2# pwd
>>>>>>>> /home/tsakai
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2#
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2# ls -l /root/.ssh/config
>>>>>>>> -rw------- 1 root root 103 Feb 11 00:56 /root/.ssh/config
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2#
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2# cat /root/.ssh/config
>>>>>>>> Host *
>>>>>>>>        IdentityFile /root/.ssh/.derobee/.kagi
>>>>>>>>        IdentitiesOnly yes
>>>>>>>>        BatchMode yes
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2#
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2# pwd
>>>>>>>> /home/tsakai
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2#
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2# ls -l
>>>>>>>> total 8
>>>>>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 tsakai tsakai 274 Feb 11 00:47 app.ac
>>>>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 tsakai tsakai 379 Feb 11 00:48 fib.R
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2#
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2# # now is the time for mpirun
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2#
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2# mpirun --app ./app.ac
>>>>>>>> 13 ip-10-100-243-195
>>>>>>>> 21 ip-10-100-243-195
>>>>>>>> 5 ip-10-195-198-31
>>>>>>>> 8 ip-10-195-198-31
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2#
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2# # It works (being root)!
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2#
>>>>>>>> bash-3.2# exit
>>>>>>>> exit
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ # try it one more time as tsakai
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ mpirun --app app.ac
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> mpirun was unable to launch the specified application as it encountered
>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> error:
>>>>>>>> Error: pipe function call failed when setting up I/O forwarding
>>>>>>>> subsystem
>>>>>>>> Node: ip-10-195-198-31
>>>>>>>> while attempting to start process rank 0.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ # I don't get it.
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-198-31 ~]$ exit
>>>>>>>> logout
>>>>>>>> [tsakai@vixen ec2]$
>>>>>>>> So, why does it say "pipe function call failed when setting up
>>>>>>>> I/O forwarding subsystem Node: ip-10-195-198-31" ?
>>>>>>>> The node it is referring to is not the remote machine.  It is
>>>>>>>> What I call machine A.  I first thought maybe this is a problem
>>>>>>>> With PATH variable.  But I don't think so.  I compared root's
>>>>>>>> Path to that of tsaki's and made them identical and retried.
>>>>>>>> I got the same behavior.
>>>>>>>> If you could enlighten me why this is happening, I would really
>>>>>>>> Appreciate it.
>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>> Tena
>>>>>>>> On 2/10/11 4:12 PM, "Tena Sakai" <tsa...@gallo.ucsf.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi jeff,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the firewall tip.  I tried it while allowing all tip 
>>>>>>>>> traffic
>>>>>>>>> and got interesting and preplexing result.  Here's what's interesting
>>>>>>>>> (BTW, I got rid of "LogLevel DEBUG3" from ./ssh/config on this run):
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ mpirun --app app.ac2
>>>>>>>>> Host key verification failed.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>
>>>>> 
>>> -
>>>>>>>>> A daemon (pid 2743) died unexpectedly with status 255 while attempting
>>>>>>>>> to launch so we are aborting.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There may be more information reported by the environment (see above).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed
>>>>>>>>> shared
>>>>>>>>> libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to have
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this will
>>>>>>>>> automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>
>>>>> 
>>> -
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>
>>>>> 
>>> -
>>>>>>>>> mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the process
>>>>>>>>> that caused that situation.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>
>>>>> 
>>> -
>>>>>>>>> mpirun: clean termination accomplished
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ env | grep LD_LIB
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ # Let's set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
>>>>>>>>> /usr/local/lib
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH='/usr/local/lib'
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ # I better to this on machine B as well
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ ssh -i tsakai ip-10-195-171-159
>>>>>>>>> Warning: Identity file tsakai not accessible: No such file or
>>>>>>>>> directory.
>>>>>>>>> Last login: Thu Feb 10 18:31:20 2011 from 10.203.21.132
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-171-159 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-171-159 ~]$ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH='/usr/local/lib'
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-171-159 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-171-159 ~]$ env | grep LD_LIB
>>>>>>>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-171-159 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-171-159 ~]$ # OK, now go bak to machine A
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-195-171-159 ~]$ exit
>>>>>>>>> logout
>>>>>>>>> Connection to ip-10-195-171-159 closed.
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ hostname
>>>>>>>>> ip-10-203-21-132
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ # try mpirun again
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ mpirun --app app.ac2
>>>>>>>>> Host key verification failed.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>
>>>>> 
>>> -
>>>>>>>>> A daemon (pid 2789) died unexpectedly with status 255 while attempting
>>>>>>>>> to launch so we are aborting.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There may be more information reported by the environment (see above).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed
>>>>>>>>> shared
>>>>>>>>> libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to have
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this will
>>>>>>>>> automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>
>>>>> 
>>> -
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>
>>>>> 
>>> -
>>>>>>>>> mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the process
>>>>>>>>> that caused that situation.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>
>>>>> 
>>> -
>>>>>>>>> mpirun: clean termination accomplished
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ # I thought openmpi library was in
>>>>>>>>> /usr/local/lib...
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ ll -t /usr/local/lib | less
>>>>>>>>> total 16604
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      16 Feb  8 23:06 libfuse.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libfuse.so.2.8.5
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      16 Feb  8 23:06 libfuse.so.2 ->
>>>>>>>>> libfuse.so.2.8.5
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      25 Feb  8 23:06 libmca_common_sm.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libmca_common_sm.so.1.0.0
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      25 Feb  8 23:06 libmca_common_sm.so.1 ->
>>>>>>>>> libmca_common_sm.so.1.0.0
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      15 Feb  8 23:06 libmpi.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libmpi.so.0.0.2
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      15 Feb  8 23:06 libmpi.so.0 ->
>>>>>>>>> libmpi.so.0.0.2
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      19 Feb  8 23:06 libmpi_cxx.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libmpi_cxx.so.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      19 Feb  8 23:06 libmpi_cxx.so.0 ->
>>>>>>>>> libmpi_cxx.so.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      19 Feb  8 23:06 libmpi_f77.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libmpi_f77.so.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      19 Feb  8 23:06 libmpi_f77.so.0 ->
>>>>>>>>> libmpi_f77.so.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      19 Feb  8 23:06 libmpi_f90.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libmpi_f90.so.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      19 Feb  8 23:06 libmpi_f90.so.0 ->
>>>>>>>>> libmpi_f90.so.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      20 Feb  8 23:06 libopen-pal.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libopen-pal.so.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      20 Feb  8 23:06 libopen-pal.so.0 ->
>>>>>>>>> libopen-pal.so.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      20 Feb  8 23:06 libopen-rte.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libopen-rte.so.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      20 Feb  8 23:06 libopen-rte.so.0 ->
>>>>>>>>> libopen-rte.so.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      26 Feb  8 23:06 libopenmpi_malloc.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libopenmpi_malloc.so.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      26 Feb  8 23:06 libopenmpi_malloc.so.0 ->
>>>>>>>>> libopenmpi_malloc.so.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      20 Feb  8 23:06 libulockmgr.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libulockmgr.so.1.0.1
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      20 Feb  8 23:06 libulockmgr.so.1 ->
>>>>>>>>> libulockmgr.so.1.0.1
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      16 Feb  8 23:06 libxml2.so ->
>>>>>>>>> libxml2.so.2.7.2
>>>>>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      16 Feb  8 23:06 libxml2.so.2 ->
>>>>>>>>> libxml2.so.2.7.2
>>>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  385912 Jan 26 01:00 libvt.a
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$ # Now, I am really confused...
>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@ip-10-203-21-132 ~]$
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Do you know why it's complaining about shared libraries?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Tena
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/11 1:05 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Your prior mails were about ssh issues, but this one sounds like you
>>>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>> have firewall issues.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> That is, the "orted" command attempts to open a TCP socket back to
>>>>>>>>>> mpirun
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> various command and control reasons.  If it is blocked from doing so
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> firewall, Open MPI won't run.  In general, you can either disable 
>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>> firewall or you can setup a trust relationship for TCP connections
>>>>>>>>>> within
>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Tena Sakai wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Reuti,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for suggesting "LogLevel DEBUG3."  I did so and complete
>>>>>>>>>>> session is captured in the attached file.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> What I did is much similar to what I have done before: verify
>>>>>>>>>>> that ssh works and then run mpirun command.  In my a bit lengthy
>>>>>>>>>>> session log, there are two responses from "LogLevel DEBUG3."  First
>>>>>>>>>>> from an scp invocation and then from mpirun invocation.  They both
>>>>>>>>>>> say
>>>>>>>>>>> debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey).
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> From mpirun invocation, I see a line:
>>>>>>>>>>> debug1: Sending command:  orted --daemonize -mca ess env -mca
>>>>>>>>>>> orte_ess_jobid 3344891904 -mca orte_ess_vpid 1 -mca
>>>>>>>>>>> orte_ess_num_procs
>>>>>>>>>>> 2 --hnp-uri "3344891904.0;tcp://10.194.95.239:54256"
>>>>>>>>>>> The IP address at the end of the line is indeed that of machine B.
>>>>>>>>>>> After that there was hanging and I controlled-C out of it, which
>>>>>>>>>>> gave me more lines.  But the lines after
>>>>>>>>>>> debug1: Sending command:  orted bla bla bla
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't look good to me.  But, in truth, I have no idea what they
>>>>>>>>>>> mean.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> If you could shed some light, I would appreciate it very much.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Tena
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/11 10:57 AM, "Reuti" <re...@staff.uni-marburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 10.02.2011 um 19:11 schrieb Tena Sakai:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your local machine is Linux like, but the execution hosts
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are Macs? I saw the /Users/tsakai/... in your output.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, my environment is entirely linux.  The path to my home
>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory on one host (blitzen) has been known as /Users/tsakai,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> despite it is an nfs mount from vixen (which is known to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as /home/tsakai).  For historical reasons, I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> chosen to give a symbolic link named /Users to vixen's /Home,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that I can use consistent path for both vixen and blitzen.
>>>>>>>>>>>> okay. Sometimes the protection of the home directory must be
>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted
>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>> as you can do it from the command line this shouldn't be an issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this a private cluster (or at least private interfaces)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would also be an option to use hostbased authentication,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which will avoid setting any known_hosts file or passphraseless
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ssh-keys for each user.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it is not a private cluster.  It is Amazon EC2.  When I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ssh from my local machine (vixen) I use its public interface,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but to address from one amazon cluster node to the other I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use nodes' private dns names: domU-12-31-39-07-35-21 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> domU-12-31-39-06-74-E2.  Both public and private dns names
>>>>>>>>>>>>> change from a launch to another.  I am using passphrasesless
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ssh-keys for authentication in all cases, i.e., from vixen to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazon node A, from amazon node A to amazon node B, and from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazon node B back to A.  (Please see my initail post.  There
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a session dialogue for this.)  They all work without authen-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tication dialogue, except a brief initial dialogue:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The authenticity of host 'domu-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-x (10.xx.xx.xx)'
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't be established.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> RSA key fingerprint is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> e3:ad:75:b1:a4:63:7f:0f:c4:0b:10:71:f3:2f:21:81.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to which I say "yes."
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I am unclear with what you mean by "hostbased authentication"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't that mean with password?  If so, it is not an option.
>>>>>>>>>>>> No. It's convenient inside a private cluster as it won't fill each
>>>>>>>>>>>> users'
>>>>>>>>>>>> known_hosts file and you don't need to create any ssh-keys. But 
>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> hostname changes every time it might also create new hostkeys. It
>>>>>>>>>>>> uses
>>>>>>>>>>>> hostkeys (private and public), this way it works for all users. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> reference:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://arc.liv.ac.uk/SGE/howto/hostbased-ssh.html
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You could look into it later.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Can you try to use a command when connecting from A to B? E.g. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ssh
>>>>>>>>>>>> `domU-12-31-39-06-74-E2 ls`. Is this working too?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> - What about putting:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> LogLevel DEBUG3
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> In your ~/.ssh/config. Maybe we can see what he's trying to
>>>>>>>>>>>> negotiate
>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>> it fails in verbose mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Reuti
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tena
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/11 2:27 AM, "Reuti" <re...@staff.uni-marburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your local machine is Linux like, but the execution hosts are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Macs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> saw
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Users/tsakai/... in your output.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a) executing a command on them is also working, e.g.: ssh
>>>>>>>>>>>>> domU-12-31-39-07-35-21 ls
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 10.02.2011 um 07:08 schrieb Tena Sakai:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have made a bit of progress(?)...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made a config file in my .ssh directory on the cloud.  It looks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> like:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> # machine A
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Host domU-12-31-39-07-35-21.compute-1.internal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is just an abbreviation or nickname above. To use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified
>>>>>>>>>>>>> settings,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's necessary to specify exactly this name. When the settings are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyway for all machines, you can use:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Host *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IdentityFile /home/tsakai/.ssh/tsakai
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IdentitiesOnly yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchMode yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this a private cluster (or at least private interfaces)? It
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an option to use hostbased authentication, which will avoid 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> known_hosts file or passphraseless ssh-keys for each user.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Reuti
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HostName domU-12-31-39-07-35-21
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchMode yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IdentityFile /home/tsakai/.ssh/tsakai
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ChallengeResponseAuthentication no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IdentitiesOnly yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> # machine B
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Host domU-12-31-39-06-74-E2.compute-1.internal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HostName domU-12-31-39-06-74-E2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchMode yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IdentityFile /home/tsakai/.ssh/tsakai
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ChallengeResponseAuthentication no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IdentitiesOnly yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This file exists on both machine A and machine B.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now When I issue mpirun command as below:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-06-74-E2 ~]$ mpirun -app app.ac2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It hungs.  I control-C out of it and I get:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mpirun: killing job...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> ->
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that caused that situation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> ->
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> ->
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mpirun was unable to cleanly terminate the daemons on the nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>> below. Additional manual cleanup may be required - please refer to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "orte-clean" tool for assistance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> ->
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    domU-12-31-39-07-35-21.compute-1.internal - daemon did not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> report
>>>>>>>>>>>>> back when launched
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I making progress?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean I am past authentication and something else is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does someone have an example .ssh/config file I can look at?  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> many keyword-argument paris for this config file and I would like
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some very basic one that works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tena Sakai
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsa...@gallo.ucsf.edu
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/11 7:52 PM, "Tena Sakai" <tsa...@gallo.ucsf.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have an app.ac1 file like below:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@vixen local]$ cat app.ac1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -H vixen.egcrc.org   -np 1 Rscript
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Users/tsakai/Notes/R/parallel/Rmpi/local/fib.R 5
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -H vixen.egcrc.org   -np 1 Rscript
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Users/tsakai/Notes/R/parallel/Rmpi/local/fib.R 6
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -H blitzen.egcrc.org -np 1 Rscript
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Users/tsakai/Notes/R/parallel/Rmpi/local/fib.R 7
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -H blitzen.egcrc.org -np 1 Rscript
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Users/tsakai/Notes/R/parallel/Rmpi/local/fib.R 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The program I run is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rscript /Users/tsakai/Notes/R/parallel/Rmpi/local/fib.R x
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where x is [5..8].  The machines vixen and blitzen each run 2 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> runs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here’s the program fib.R:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ tsakai@vixen local]$ cat fib.R
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    # fib() computes, given index n, fibonacci number iteratively
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    # here's the first dozen sequence (indexed from 0..11)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    # 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fib <- function( n ) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        a <- 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        b <- 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        for ( i in 1:n ) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>             t <- b
>>>>>>>>>>>>>             b <- a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>             a <- a + t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> arg <- commandArgs( TRUE )
>>>>>>>>>>>>> myHost <- system( 'hostname', intern=TRUE )
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cat( fib(arg), myHost, '\n' )
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It reads an argument from command line and produces a fibonacci
>>>>>>>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponds to that index, followed by the machine name.  Pretty
>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here’s the run output:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@vixen local]$ mpirun -app app.ac1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5 vixen.egcrc.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 vixen.egcrc.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13 blitzen.egcrc.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 blitzen.egcrc.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is exactly what I expect.  So far so good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now I want to run the same thing on cloud.  I launch 2 instances 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual machine, to which I get to by:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@vixen local]$ ssh –A I ~/.ssh/tsakai
>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine-instance-A-public-dns
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now I am on machine A:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ # and I can go to machine B
>>>>>>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>>>>> password authentication,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ # i.e., use public/private key
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ hostname
>>>>>>>>>>>>> domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ ssh -i .ssh/tsakai
>>>>>>>>>>>>> domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Last login: Wed Feb  9 20:51:48 2011 from 10.254.214.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 ~]$ # I am now on machine B
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 ~]$ hostname
>>>>>>>>>>>>> domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 ~]$ # now show I can get to machine
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>>>>>>> without using password
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 ~]$ ssh -i .ssh/tsakai
>>>>>>>>>>>>> domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The authenticity of host 'domu-12-31-39-00-d1-f2 (10.254.214.4)'
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be established.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> RSA key fingerprint is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> e3:ad:75:b1:a4:63:7f:0f:c4:0b:10:71:f3:2f:21:81.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning: Permanently added 'domu-12-31-39-00-d1-f2' (RSA) to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> known hosts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Last login: Wed Feb  9 20:49:34 2011 from 10.215.203.239
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ hostname
>>>>>>>>>>>>> domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ exit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> logout
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Connection to domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 closed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 ~]$ exit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> logout
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Connection to domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 closed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ # back at machine A
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ hostname
>>>>>>>>>>>>> domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you can see, neither machine uses password for authentication;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses
>>>>>>>>>>>>> public/private key pairs.  There is no problem (that I can see) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ssh
>>>>>>>>>>>>> invocation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from one machine to the other.  This is so because I have a copy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> public
>>>>>>>>>>>>> key
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a copy of private key on each instance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The app.ac file is identical, except the node names:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ cat app.ac1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -H domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 -np 1 Rscript /home/tsakai/fib.R 5
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -H domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 -np 1 Rscript /home/tsakai/fib.R 6
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -H domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 -np 1 Rscript /home/tsakai/fib.R 7
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -H domU-12-31-39-0C-C8-01 -np 1 Rscript /home/tsakai/fib.R 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here’s what happens with mpirun:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$ mpirun -app app.ac1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsakai@domu-12-31-39-0c-c8-01's password:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Permission denied, please try again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsakai@domu-12-31-39-0c-c8-01's password: mpirun: killing job...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------->
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that caused that situation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------->
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mpirun: clean termination accomplished
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [tsakai@domU-12-31-39-00-D1-F2 ~]$
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mpirun (or somebody else?) asks me password, which I don’t have.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I end up typing control-C.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here’s my question:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can I get past authentication by mpirun where there is no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> password?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate your help/insight greatly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tena Sakai
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsa...@gallo.ucsf.edu
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 


Reply via email to