On May 12, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On May 11, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Dave Love wrote: > >> We can reproduce it with IMB. We could provide access, but we'd have to >> negotiate with the owners of the relevant nodes to give you interactive >> access to them. Maybe Brock's would be more accessible? (If you >> contact me, I may not be able to respond for a few days.) > > Brock has replied off-list that he, too, is able to reliably reproduce the > issue with IMB, and is working to get access for us. Many thanks for your > offer; let's see where Brock's access takes us.
I should also note that as far as I know I have three codes (CRASH, Namd (some cases), and another user code. That lockup on a collective on OpenIB but run with the same library on Gig-e. So I am not sure it is limited to IMB, or I could be crossing errors, normally I would assume unmatched eager recvs for this sort of problem. > >>> -- we have not closed this issue, >> >> Which issue? I couldn't find a relevant-looking one. > > https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2714 > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > >
