Am 31.01.2012 um 20:12 schrieb Jeff Squyres: > I only noticed after the fact that Tom is also here at Cisco (it's a big > company, after all :-) ). > > I've contacted him using our proprietary super-secret Cisco handshake (i.e., > the internal phone network); I'll see if I can figure out the issues off-list.
But I would be interested in a statement about a hostlist for singleton startups. Or whether it's honoring the tight integration nodes more by accident than by design. And as said: I see a wrong allocation, as the initial ./Mpitest doesn't count as process. I get a 3+1 allocation instead of 2+2 (what is granted by SGE). If started with "mpiexec -np 1 ./Mpitest" all is fine. -- Reuti > On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Dave Love wrote: > >> Reuti <re...@staff.uni-marburg.de> writes: >> >>> Maybe it's a side effect of a tight integration that it would start on >>> the correct nodes (but I face an incorrect allocation of slots and an >>> error message at the end if started without mpiexec), as in this case >>> it has no command line option for the hostfile. How to get the >>> requested nodes if started from the command line? >> >> Yes, I wouldn't expect it to work without mpirun/mpiexec and, of course, >> I basically agree with Reuti about the rest. >> >> If there is an actual SGE problem or need for an enhancement, though, >> please file it per https://arc.liv.ac.uk/trac/SGE#mail >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> us...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
