Hard to say - unless there is some reason, why not make it large enough to not be an issue? You may have to experiment a bit as there is nothing to guarantee that other processes aren't occupying those regions.
On Mar 18, 2021, at 2:13 AM, Sendu Bala <s...@sanger.ac.uk <mailto:s...@sanger.ac.uk> > wrote: Thanks, it made it work when I was running “true” as a test, but then my real MPI app failed with: [node-5-8-2][[48139,1],0][btl_tcp_component.c:966:mca_btl_tcp_component_create_listen] bind() failed: no port available in the range [46107..46139] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- At least one pair of MPI processes are unable to reach each other for MPI communications. This means that no Open MPI device has indicated that it can be used to communicate between these processes. This is an error; Open MPI requires that all MPI processes be able to reach each other. This error can sometimes be the result of forgetting to specify the "self" BTL. Process 1 ([[48139,1],1]) is on host: node-12-6-2 Process 2 ([[48139,1],0]) is on host: node-5-8-2 BTLs attempted: self tcp Your MPI job is now going to abort; sorry. This was when running with 16 cores, so I thought a 32 port range would be fine. Is this telling me I have to make it a 33 port range, have different ranges for oob and btl, or that some other unrelated software is using some ports in my range? (I changed my range from my previous post, because using that range resulted in the issue I posted about here before, where mpirun just does nothing for 5mins and then terminates itself, without any error messages.) Cheers, Sendu. On 17 Mar 2021, at 13:25, Ralph Castain via users <users@lists.open-mpi.org <mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org> > wrote: What you are missing is that there are _two_ messaging layers in the system. You told the btl/tcp layer to use the specified ports, but left the oob/tcp one unspecified. You need to add oob_tcp_dynamic_ipv4_ports = 46207-46239 or whatever range you want to specify Note that if you want the btl/tcp layer to use those other settings (e.g., keepalive_time), then you'll need to set those as well. The names of the variables may not match between the layers - you'll need to use ompi_info to find the names and params available for each layer. On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:43 AM, Vincent via users <users@lists.open-mpi.org <mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org> > wrote: On 09/03/2021 11:23, Sendu Bala via users wrote: When using mpirun, how do you pick which ports are used? I???ve tried: mpirun --mca btl_tcp_port_min_v4 46207 --mca btl_tcp_port_range_v4 32 --mca oob_tcp_keepalive_time 45 --mca oob_tcp_max_recon_attempts 20 --mca oob_tcp_retry_delay 1 --mca oob_tcp_keepalive_probes 20 --mca oob_tcp_keepalive_intvl 10 true And also setting similar things in openmpi/etc/openmpi-mca-params.conf : btl_tcp_port_min_v4 = 46207 btl_tcp_port_range_v4 = 32 oob_tcp_keepalive_time = 45 oob_tcp_max_recon_attempts = 20 oob_tcp_retry_delay = 1 oob_tcp_keepalive_probes = 20 oob_tcp_keepalive_intvl = 10 But when the process is running: ss -l -p -n | grep "pid=57642," tcp LISTEN 0 128 127.0.0.1:58439 0.0.0.0:* users:(("mpirun",pid=57642,fd=14)) tcp LISTEN 0 128 0.0.0.0:36253 0.0.0.0:* users:(("mpirun",pid=57642,fd=17)) What am I doing wrong, and how do I get it to use my desired ports (and other settings above)? Hello Could this be related to some recently resolved bug ? What version are you running ? Having a look on https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_open-2Dmpi_ompi_issues_8304&d=DwIFaQ&c=D7ByGjS34AllFgecYw0iC6Zq7qlm8uclZFI0SqQnqBo&r=R4ZUzQZ7_TZ1SVV_pAmysrrJ1zatMHFpzMNAdJSpPIo&m=Dv6xQizR35EO5Xf86whFlO2mZWbJO9kT0iMDaeL0iXs&s=RhsRamUPqN_mfRS_JffG2ZAfqgCaYGL1Fkqbv1d3WB8&e= could be possibly useful? Regards Vincent. -- The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.