I would like to have patch for 1.3.0 too :-) Thanks, regards
kokoska.rokoska Daniel-Constantin Mierla napsal(a): > There is bug mistakenly introduced about 2 years ago, if I could spot it > right on the svn log. A wrong variable for registrar address was used. I > have just made a commit on trunk. Can you test and let me know if works > now? If you need patch for 1.3 I can send it to you -- I will backport > after some testing is done. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > > On 02/05/08 11:37, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >> On Tuesday 05 February 2008 10:08:16 Dan-Cristian Bogos wrote: >> >>> Iñaki, >>> >>> it looks like I have misunderstood your problem. >>> >>> I was speaking about "202 Accepted" confirmation and not a new MESSAGE. >>> >> Yes, that was what I meant ;) >> >> >> >>> Why would you need a new message? >>> >> Because it's the only way that any UAC will show the notification to its >> user. >> For example: >> >> - If X-Lite sends a MESSAGE and it's stored and replied by proxy with "202 >> Accepted" then XLite UI will show nothing to the user, but message correctly >> received by destination, so he will think that the destinaiton is ireceiving >> him messages but ignoring them. >> >> - If the message is stored and proxy replies "404 User Not Found, MEssage >> Stored" then XLite will just show in the UI: "404 User is not online". >> >> - Twinkle will not show the code description for a 202, but it will do it in >> a >> negative reply (404 for example), but Twinkle IM is not very advanced yet in >> usability terms. >> >> >> Best regards. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
