Hi Sebastain. I would suggest to use the following variables instead of the one below.
### openshift_master_public_api_url=https://manage.{{ osm_default_subdomain }} openshift_master_public_console_url={{ openshift_master_public_api_url }}/console ### Maybe you would also be interested in this thread. http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshift-archives/users/2016-March/thread.html#00170 BR Aleks ________________________________________ From: users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com <users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com> on behalf of Sebastian Wieseler <sebast...@myrepublic.com.sg> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 11:25 To: users@lists.openshift.redhat.com Subject: private vs. public address openshift master (ansible playbook) Hi guys, I hope you can help me out of this. I configured the parameters in the ansible playbook differently openshift_master_cluster_hostname= openshift_master_cluster_public_hostname= But it seems that the public_hostname is overriding the hostname parameter. I followed the advanced installation guide for OpenShift origin in a multi master (3 masters, 2 nodes) environment. Per design I would like to separate the load balancer for access from the outside (for the exposed routes, plus cluster administration) and the load balancer for the node connections and app connections to the master cluster. Therefor I am required to separate hostname and public_hostname. It’s not useful that the one is override the other. Can somebody please advice? Thanks a lot i advance! Best Regards, Sebastian Wieseler _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.openshift.redhat.com http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.openshift.redhat.com http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
