Hello Bogdan,

 Thank you for your help.

 My problem of Dialog module is solved. The dialog were not inserted into
the DB. But now its inserted. I have set the flag before the INVITE and
after forwardign the call to proxy. Now its working fine.

 One more question I would like to ask is that, for a single call 3 dialogs
are created. Is this correct or not ?

 1) for initial INVITE without authenticatin.
-------------------------------------------------

INV Dialog-1 --> created
401 Dialog-1 --> destroying

2) Again for INVITE with authentication.
--------------------------------------------------
INV Dialog-2 --> Created
INV TO Proxy Dialog-2 --> Destroying

3) When get the response from Proxy (i.e Asterisk)
--------------------------------------------------------------
>From Proxy Dialog-3 --> Created
180
200
ACK Dialog entry Deleted form DB
BYE Dialog Destroyed

 Thanks a lot for your support.


 -Urmi


On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:32 PM, urmi lakkad <urmi.lak...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Bogdan,
>
> Thank you for ur attention.
>
> Sorry for inconvenience. I know  "patience is a virtues". But See, I m
> trying to solve this problem from almost 1 week. and when I am sending you
> the LOG file, I got a mail of moderator Approval. Thats y I have to remove
> some of the log.
>
> Anyways, Now I am sending you full call log of OpenSIPs.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> -Urmi
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <
> bog...@voice-system.ro> wrote:
>
>> Hi Urmi,
>>
>> some great philosopher said "patience is a virtues" ;).
>>
>> I took a look at the log you sent and does not seam to be complete. I
>> was looking for the processing of 200 OK reply and all I could found was:
>>
>> Aug 25 16:06:43 [5488] DBG:core:parse_msg: version: <SIP/2.0>
>> Aug 25 16:06:43 [5488] DBG:core:parse_msg: status: <200>
>> Aug 25 16:06:43 [5488] DBG:core:parse_msg: reason: <OK>
>>
>>
>> nothing following from the 5488 process.......
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bogdan
>>
>> urmi lakkad wrote:
>> > Hello Bogdan,
>> >
>> > Thank you very much.
>> > Here I have attached my OpenSIPs Log. so please find the attachment.
>> >
>> > -Urmi
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Looks good - can you post the opensips logs (in debug=6) for this single
>> > call ? just to verify.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Bogdan
>> >
>> > urmi lakkad wrote:
>> > > Hello Bogdan,
>> > >
>> > > Thank you for ur response.
>> > >
>> > > Here with this mail I have _attached my SIP call capture_ using ngrep.
>> > > So, please find the attachment. and do needful.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -Thanks
>> > > Urmi
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> > > <bog...@voice-system.ro <mailto:bog...@voice-system.ro>
>> > <mailto:bog...@voice-system.ro <mailto:bog...@voice-system.ro>>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Post the SIP capture of the call you are testing with. Use "ngrep
>> > > -d any
>> > > . port 5060" to get the capture - this will solve the mystery.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Bogdan
>> > >
>> > > urmi lakkad wrote:
>> > > > Hello,
>> > > >
>> > > > Can u please suggest me some solution of my problem of DIALLOG
>> > > module ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you for your attention.
>> > > >
>> > > > -Urmi
>> > > >
>> > > > 2009/8/21 urmi lakkad <urmi.lak...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>
>> > > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>>
>> > > > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>
>> > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>>>>
>> > > >
>> > > > Hello Brett,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you very much for quick response.
>> > > >
>> > > > My calls are working fine. I have checked through SIPp and also
>> > > > with Grandstream Phones. The call is working fine with out
>> > > > failure. At the time of call, I have started the wireshark to
>> > > > capture the packets, but there also I m not getting any negative
>> > > > reply like 400 or 300.
>> > > >
>> > > > See, my call is working fine, call dialog created successfully,
>> > > > but after that it destroyed, again new dialog is created n that
>> > > > too destroy. For a single call it creates 2 dialogs. But that
>> > > > dialog entry is not going to DB. Please suggest me the right thing
>> > > > to do.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks a lot for your attention.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -Urmi
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Brett Nemeroff
>> > > > <br...@nemeroff.com <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com>
>> > <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com>>
>> > > <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com>
>> > <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com>>>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Urmi,
>> > > > You log shows the call having failed. I'm not sure why you
>> > > > think it runs for the proper duration. But as far as OpenSIPs
>> > > > is concerned, the call failed. It's likely a problem in your
>> > > > sipp scenario. It's very possible that sipp thinks the call is
>> > > > up, but the proxy does not.
>> > > >
>> > > > In any case, OpenSIPs is behaving as expected, the call fails,
>> > > > the dialog is destroyed.
>> > > > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog
>> > > > 0x2aaaad55af90 changed from state 1 to state 5, due event 1
>> > > > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:dlg_onreply: dialog
>> > > > 0x2aaaad55af90
>> > > > failed (negative reply)
>> > > >
>> > > > BTW, a negative reply is >=400 (or may also include >= 300,
>> > > > can't remember). Check your traces, see where that comes from.
>> > > > -Brett
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:02 AM, urmi lakkad
>> > > > <urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>
>> > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>>
>> > > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>
>> > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hello Stanisław Pitucha,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you for support.
>> > > >
>> > > > No, My call is established perfectly and is running for
>> > > > the specified duration without fail.
>> > > > I m firing the call using SIPp.
>> > > >
>> > > > Also, the dialog state gives me 1.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for ur attention.
>> > > >
>> > > > -Urmi
>> > > >
>> > > > 2009/8/20 Stanisław Pitucha <virap...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:virap...@gmail.com>
>> > > <mailto:virap...@gmail.com <mailto:virap...@gmail.com>>
>> > > > <mailto:virap...@gmail.com <mailto:virap...@gmail.com>
>> > <mailto:virap...@gmail.com <mailto:virap...@gmail.com>>>>
>> > > >
>> > > > 2009/8/20 urmi lakkad <urmi.lak...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>
>> > > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>>
>> > > > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>
>> > <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lak...@gmail.com>>>>:
>> > > > > Am I doing right or not ? If not, please tell me the
>> > > > correct way.
>> > > > > One more thing, Is my configuration is correct or not ??
>> > > >
>> > > > It looks like your call doesn't even get accepted:
>> > > > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog
>> > > > 0x2aaaad55af90 changed from state 1 to state 5, due
>> > > > event 1
>> > > > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:dlg_onreply: dialog
>> > > > 0x2aaaad55af90
>> > > > failed (negative reply)
>> > > >
>> > > > Maybe you require authentication, or something else?
>> > > > Just take care of
>> > > > the call not failing first. So far it's rejected
>> > > > before an OK answer
>> > > > (state 1 is "after sending an INVITE", state 5 is
>> > > > "deleted" - more or
>> > > > less).
>> > > > Capture the traffic and see what's going on.
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Kind regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Stanisław Pitucha, Gradwell Voip Engineer
>> > > >
>> > > > T: 01225 800 831 | F: 01225 800 801 | E:
>> > > > s...@gradwell.net <mailto:s...@gradwell.net>
>> > <mailto:s...@gradwell.net <mailto:s...@gradwell.net>>
>> > > <mailto:s...@gradwell.net <mailto:s...@gradwell.net>
>> > <mailto:s...@gradwell.net <mailto:s...@gradwell.net>>> |
>> > > > www.gradwell.com <http://www.gradwell.com>
>> > <http://www.gradwell.com> <http://www.gradwell.com>
>> > > >
>> > > > Gradwell – Internet for Business People
>> > > > Phone Services | Business Broadband | Email & Website
>> > > > Hosting
>> > > >
>> > > > Can switching to VoIP today put some change in your
>> > > > pocket?
>> > > > Registered Address: 26 Cheltenham Street, Bath, BA2
>> > > > 3EX, UK. Company
>> > > > Number: 3673235
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Users mailing list
>> > Users@lists.opensips.org
>> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to