Hi, > > Yes, I've replied to that mail right now. It seems to be a bug in mediaproxy. > > PS: IMHO you should try to avoid those two 200 OK (INVITE) at the same time > (even if it's correct). > Perhaps you could add a "Wait(1)" in top of the dialplan of the second > Asterisk server so if there won't be a race between CANCEL and 200 (INVITE).
The UAC are not under my control. > > Or even better: why you send the INVITE to both Asterisk at the same time > (parallel forking)? Is not enough for you to do load balancing and serial > forking in case of failure)? (of course it could be non suitable in your > case). No, since the subscriber with the asterisk UAC is using the INVITE as LB and Failover Solution. Since this is nothing against RFC I would like to implement it. BR Uwe -- kiste lat: 54.322684, lon: 10.13586 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users