Hi,

> 
> Yes, I've replied to that mail right now. It seems to be a bug in mediaproxy.
> 
> PS: IMHO you should try to avoid those two 200 OK (INVITE) at the same time 
> (even if it's correct).
> Perhaps you could add a "Wait(1)" in top of the dialplan of the second 
> Asterisk server so if there won't be a race between CANCEL and 200 (INVITE).

The UAC are not under my control.

> 
> Or even better: why you send the INVITE to both Asterisk at the same time 
> (parallel forking)? Is not enough for you to do load balancing and serial 
> forking in case of failure)? (of course it could be non suitable in your 
> case).

No, since the subscriber with the asterisk UAC is using the INVITE as LB
and Failover Solution. Since this is nothing against RFC I would like to
 implement it.

BR

Uwe



-- 

kiste lat: 54.322684, lon: 10.13586

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to