On Friday 23 October 2009 11:25:57 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Uwe Kastens escribió: > > Hi, > > > > > IMHO a proxy shouldn't behave as a UAC. Perhaps it can monitor dialogs > > > and so because this features just requires requests inspection, there > > > is no intrusion (adding a Record-Route parameter is not intrusion XD). > > > But behaving as an UAC is 100% intrusion. > > > > > > Yes, OpenSIPS is very flexible and can be used to solve some UA > > > problems, but the proxy shouldn't be the key for this purpose (IMHO). > > > > Ok. I am with you. > > > > But for example looking at the problem with mediaproxy (see email from > > this morning), opensips is doing to much or to less ATM. So > > mediaproxy/opensips will talk to the wrong SDP Ports, since its using > > the 2nd 200 OK with SDP from the UAC answer. > > Yes, I've replied to that mail right now. It seems to be a bug in > mediaproxy.
No, it's not a bug in mediaproxy. I think it's a bug in engage_media_proxy(), I'm pretty sure ... because I use mediaproxy with parallel forking without any problem on the same scenario, but using use_mediaproxy -- Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Dimensión Virtual _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
