Hi Taner, I would suggest a different approach - as from LB point of view you do not care too much if it VM or CONF - what is important is that each of your box has only on channel, so I would define a resource the number of channels each box can handle .
+----+----------+------------------------+---------------------------------+ | id | group_id | dst_uri | resources | +----+----------+------------------------+---------------------------------+ | 1 | 555 | sip:serv...@host1.net <mailto:sip%3aserv...@host1.net> | channel=1 | | 2 | 555 | sip:serv...@host2.net <mailto:sip%3aserv...@host2.net> | channel=1 | +----+----------+------------------------+---------------------------------+ and do (when routing a VM or conference call) : 'load_balance(.., "channel");' Regards, Bogdan Taner Sener wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using load balancer module on 1.6.0-notls (i386/linux) to balance > incoming sip calls to sip clients. The case is; my sip clients are > capable of serving multiple types of calls. But not in the same time > like in the definition "vm=1;conf=1". Only one of them is available at > that moment. They can process either a vm call, either a conf call; > not one vm call and one conf call. Is there a way to define it? > > +----+----------+------------------------+---------------------------------+ > | id | group_id | dst_uri | resources | > +----+----------+------------------------+---------------------------------+ > > | 1 | 555 | sip:serv...@host1.net <mailto:sip%3aserv...@host1.net> | > vm=1; conf=1 | > | 2 | 555 | sip:serv...@host2.net <mailto:sip%3aserv...@host2.net> | > vm=1; conf=1 | > > +----+----------+------------------------+---------------------------------+ > > Current 'resources' field of load_balancer table ANDs resource types > given with semi-colon and I when I invoke > > 'load_balance(.., "vm")' > > and > > 'load_balance(.., "conf")' > > second load balanced call receives busy and balancing fails there > because that client is serving to vm call. How can I configure > load_balanced module to select it right? > > Thanks, > Taner > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
