Ovidiu, haven't yet migrated, but I do not foresee issues with that - I will adapt :)
Regards, Bogdan Ovidiu Sas wrote: > Should I understand that all rtpproxy users have switched to > rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer? > If there are no objections, sometimes next week I will remove the old > force_rtp_proxy function. > > > Regards, > Ovidiu Sas > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Ovidiu Sas <o...@voipembedded.com> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from >> the nathelper module. >> Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used. >> >> Why? >> - force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s' >> flag was deprecated); >> - all functionality of force_rtp_proxy is provided by >> rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer; >> - rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer is easier to use in the config. >> >> Objections? >> >> >> Regards, >> Ovidiu Sas >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > de...@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel > > -- Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Bootcamp 15 - 19 November 2010, Edison, New Jersey, USA www.voice-system.ro _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users