Excellent. We are making progress here. Later on, we will need to break the nathelper module in two: - nathelper: dealing with NAT related issues - rtpproxy - connector to the rtpproxy server
Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@voice-system.ro> wrote: > Ovidiu, > > haven't yet migrated, but I do not foresee issues with that - I will > adapt :) > > Regards, > Bogdan > > Ovidiu Sas wrote: >> Should I understand that all rtpproxy users have switched to >> rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer? >> If there are no objections, sometimes next week I will remove the old >> force_rtp_proxy function. >> >> >> Regards, >> Ovidiu Sas >> >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Ovidiu Sas <o...@voipembedded.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from >>> the nathelper module. >>> Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used. >>> >>> Why? >>> - force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s' >>> flag was deprecated); >>> - all functionality of force_rtp_proxy is provided by >>> rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer; >>> - rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer is easier to use in the config. >>> >>> Objections? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ovidiu Sas >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> de...@lists.opensips.org >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >> > > > -- > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > OpenSIPS Bootcamp > 15 - 19 November 2010, Edison, New Jersey, USA > www.voice-system.ro > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users