2010/11/18 Maciej Bylica <mb...@gazeta.pl>: > Iñaki, > > Thank You for clearing a few things up. > Yes You are absolutely right with all signalization aspect, but > transaction identifier inspection really makes me think and again i > see that there are a lot aspects i need to take care of. > Could you pls point me to some hints describing the proper way to > build transaction inspection?
It's well explained in RFC 3261. An ACK for a [3456]XX response must have same branch and same CSeq number (but "ACK" method) as the INVITE of the transaction. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
