I see.....Seems ok.

could you post the logs from next_branches() - it outputs similar logs about the data pushed back into message.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 06/11/2012 03:07 PM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:

Hi Bogdan,
When I do serialize_branches(1) after look up , I can see both the contacts in logs with proper PATH values (*50.16.212.126:8060 <http://50.16.212.126:8060>*). But It process 1st contact properly but after next_branches() it does not process 2nd branch properly . It does not add *50.16.212.126:8060;lr *as route.

Jun 8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18491]: DBG:core:*serialize_branches: Msg information <sip:[email protected]:3912;transport=TCP,sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr,<sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr>,-1,0>* Jun 8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]: DBG:core:parse_headers: via found, flags=2 Jun 8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18491]: DBG:core:*serialize_branches: Branch information <sip:[email protected]:2043;transport=TCP,sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr,<sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr>,-1,0>* Jun 8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]: DBG:core:parse_headers: this is the first via


Thanx,
Gomtesh

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Gomtesh,

    Do your saved contacts contain a PATH field at all ? check with
    "opensipsctl ul show" to see if the path was stored in usrloc cache.

    Maybe your problem is not at "lookup" time, but rather at "save" time.

    Regards,
    Bogdan

    Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
    OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
    http://www.opensips-solutions.com


    On 06/11/2012 10:56 AM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
    Hi ,
       I am using opensips 1.6 . I am facing an issue here . It seems
    In faliure route when I do next_branches() it does not set value
    of "path" (from lookup) as distination/route . Which results ,
    opensips try to send message directly to UA .
    Here I give N/w diagram

UA1(115.X.X.X)-------[PROXY]--------| |
                                                              |
    Registrar/Opensips   |
UA2 (122.x.x.x)--------[PROXY]-------| |


    The issue I am facing is ...
    1. On any INVITE to Opensips after lookup Opensips sends invite
    to Proxy
    2. On any faliure response in "Faiure Route"
    3. When I do next_branches() it tries to send INVITE directly to
    122.X.X.X .

    -----------------HERE I GIVE PIECE OF
    Opnesips.cfg--------------------


           xlog("L_NOTICE", "SERIALIZE BRANCHES ($rm) r-uri ($ru) :
    Contact : $ct  :callID $ci : CSeq $cs \n");
                            if (!serialize_branches(1)){
                                    sl_send_reply("500","Unable to
    load contacts");
                                    exit;
                            }else{
                          xlog("L_NOTICE", "PREPARE FIRST BRANCH
    ($rm) r-uri ($ru) : Contact : $ct  :callID $ci : CSeq $cs \n");
                                    if (next_branches()){
                                        xlog("L_NOTICE", "NEXT BRANCH
    After Seri :callID $ci : CSeq $cs \n");
                                            t_on_failure("1");
                                    }
                                    #else{
                                    #       sl_send_reply("504","Not
    found ");
                                    #       exit;
                                    #}
                            }
                            append_hf("P-hint: lcr applied\r\n");

                    }else{
                            append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
                    }

            };

            route(1);
    }

    route[1] {


            if (nat_uac_test("7")) {
                fix_nated_contact();
            };
            # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works
    reliably
            # even for UDP2TCP
            xlog("L_NOTICE", " IN ROUTE BLOCK method ($rm) r-uri
    ($rs) :callID $ci \n");
            if (!t_relay()) {
                    sl_reply_error();
            };
            t_on_reply("1");
            exit;
    }

    onreply_route[1]{
      xlog("L_NOTICE", " ON REPLY BLOCK  method ($rm) r-uri ($rs)
    :callID $ci :CSeq $cs \n");
    }



    failure_route[1] {
       if ( t_check_status("404|477|408|486|50[234]")){
                    xlog("L_NOTICE", " ERROR RESPONSE MATCHED  method
    ($rm) r-uri ($rs) :callID $ci :CSeq $cs \n");
             if (next_branches())
             {
                    xlog("L_NOTICE", " ON FAILURE BLOCK  method ($rm)
    r-uri ($rs) :callID $ci :CSeq $cs \n");
                    t_on_failure("1");
                    route(1);

             }

        }
    }

    
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    I attach the log of the call in debug=9 mode.


    Please have a look at this if anyone can help me .

    Thanx,
    Gomtesh



    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to