It seems the PATH value is properly processed by the next_branch()
function - it is simply pushed into the message, but it is not used to
extract the next destination.
I made a small fix - see the attached patch - please apply it and let me
know if it did the trick for you.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 06/11/2012 03:45 PM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]:
ERROR RESPONSE MATCHED method (INVITE) r-uri (<null>) :callID
ZjUwZTkzMWI5ZjRjNDNjNDc1MGRhZDVmZjM3ZmY0YmQ. :CSeq 1
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:parse_headers: via found, flags=22
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]:
DBG:core:*next_branches*: Msg information
<sip:[email protected]:2043;transport=TCP,sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr,<sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr>,-1,0>
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:parse_headers: parse_headers: this is the second via
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]: ON
FAILURE BLOCK method (INVITE) r-uri (<null>) :callID
ZjUwZTkzMWI5ZjRjNDNjNDc1MGRhZDVmZjM3ZmY0YmQ. :CSeq 1
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:parse_to_param: tag=7963038936cb090485262a576bc5dd22-8eae
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]:
DBG:core:check_ip_address: params 122.177.144.180, 192.168.3.128, 0
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:parse_to: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]:
DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=80
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:parse_to: display={"855_1_7agentsURI"},
ruri={sip:[email protected]:5506
<http://sip:[email protected]:5506>}
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]: IN
ROUTE BLOCK method (INVITE) r-uri (<null>) :callID
ZjUwZTkzMWI5ZjRjNDNjNDc1MGRhZDVmZjM3ZmY0YmQ.
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:get_hdr_field: <To> [112];
uri=[sip:[email protected]:5506
<http://sip:[email protected]:5506>]
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]:
DBG:core:mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:get_hdr_field: to body
["855_1_7agentsURI"<sip:[email protected]:5506
<http://sip:[email protected]:5506>>]
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]:
DBG:core:get_send_socket: force_send_socket of different proto (2)!
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <INVITE>
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]:
DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=2000
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=8
Jun 8 11:40:03 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18488]:
DBG:core:tcp_send: no open tcp connection found, opening new one
Thanx,
Gomtesh
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I see.....Seems ok.
could you post the logs from next_branches() - it outputs similar
logs about the data pushed back into message.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 06/11/2012 03:07 PM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
When I do serialize_branches(1) after look up , I can see
both the contacts in logs with proper PATH values
(*50.16.212.126:8060 <http://50.16.212.126:8060>*).
But It process 1st contact properly but after next_branches() it
does not process 2nd branch properly . It does not add
*50.16.212.126:8060;lr *as route.
Jun 8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174
/usr/local/sbin/opensips[18491]: DBG:core:*serialize_branches:
Msg information
<sip:[email protected]:3912;transport=TCP,sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr,<sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr>,-1,0>*
Jun 8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174
/usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]: DBG:core:parse_headers: via
found, flags=2
Jun 8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174
/usr/local/sbin/opensips[18491]: DBG:core:*serialize_branches:
Branch information
<sip:[email protected]:2043;transport=TCP,sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr,<sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr>,-1,0>*
Jun 8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174
/usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]: DBG:core:parse_headers: this is
the first via
Thanx,
Gomtesh
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Gomtesh,
Do your saved contacts contain a PATH field at all ? check
with "opensipsctl ul show" to see if the path was stored in
usrloc cache.
Maybe your problem is not at "lookup" time, but rather at
"save" time.
Regards,
Bogdan
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 06/11/2012 10:56 AM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
Hi ,
I am using opensips 1.6 . I am facing an issue here . It
seems In faliure route when I do next_branches() it does not
set value of "path" (from lookup) as distination/route .
Which results , opensips try to send message directly to UA .
Here I give N/w diagram
UA1(115.X.X.X)-------[PROXY]--------|
|
|
Registrar/Opensips |
UA2 (122.x.x.x)--------[PROXY]-------|
|
The issue I am facing is ...
1. On any INVITE to Opensips after lookup Opensips sends
invite to Proxy
2. On any faliure response in "Faiure Route"
3. When I do next_branches() it tries to send INVITE
directly to 122.X.X.X .
-----------------HERE I GIVE PIECE OF
Opnesips.cfg--------------------
xlog("L_NOTICE", "SERIALIZE BRANCHES ($rm) r-uri
($ru) : Contact : $ct :callID $ci : CSeq $cs \n");
if (!serialize_branches(1)){
sl_send_reply("500","Unable
to load contacts");
exit;
}else{
xlog("L_NOTICE", "PREPARE FIRST BRANCH
($rm) r-uri ($ru) : Contact : $ct :callID $ci : CSeq $cs \n");
if (next_branches()){
xlog("L_NOTICE", "NEXT
BRANCH After Seri :callID $ci : CSeq $cs \n");
t_on_failure("1");
}
#else{
#
sl_send_reply("504","Not found ");
# exit;
#}
}
append_hf("P-hint: lcr applied\r\n");
}else{
append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
}
};
route(1);
}
route[1] {
if (nat_uac_test("7")) {
fix_nated_contact();
};
# send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it
works reliably
# even for UDP2TCP
xlog("L_NOTICE", " IN ROUTE BLOCK method ($rm) r-uri
($rs) :callID $ci \n");
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
t_on_reply("1");
exit;
}
onreply_route[1]{
xlog("L_NOTICE", " ON REPLY BLOCK method ($rm) r-uri
($rs) :callID $ci :CSeq $cs \n");
}
failure_route[1] {
if ( t_check_status("404|477|408|486|50[234]")){
xlog("L_NOTICE", " ERROR RESPONSE MATCHED
method ($rm) r-uri ($rs) :callID $ci :CSeq $cs \n");
if (next_branches())
{
xlog("L_NOTICE", " ON FAILURE BLOCK method
($rm) r-uri ($rs) :callID $ci :CSeq $cs \n");
t_on_failure("1");
route(1);
}
}
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I attach the log of the call in debug=9 mode.
Please have a look at this if anyone can help me .
Thanx,
Gomtesh
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Index: serialize.c
===================================================================
--- serialize.c (revision 9046)
+++ serialize.c (working copy)
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@
int_str val;
struct socket_info *sock_info;
qvalue_t q;
- str uri, dst_uri, path;
+ str uri, dst_uri, path, path_dst;
char *p;
unsigned int flags;
int rval;
@@ -302,10 +302,28 @@
path.s = p;
path.len = strlen(p);
+ /* set PATH and DURI */
+ if (path.s && path.len) {
+ if (get_path_dst_uri(&path, &path_dst) < 0) {
+ LM_ERR("failed to get first hop from Path\n");
+ goto error1;
+ }
+ if (set_path_vector( msg, &path) < 0) {
+ LM_ERR("failed to set path vector\n");
+ goto error1;
+ }
+ if (set_dst_uri( msg, &path_dst) < 0) {
+ LM_ERR("failed to set dst_uri of Path\n");
+ goto error1;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (set_dst_uri( msg, &dst_uri) < 0) {
+ goto error1;
+ }
+ }
+
/* Set Request-URI */
- if ( set_ruri(msg, &uri) == -1
- || set_dst_uri(msg, &dst_uri) == -1
- || set_path_vector(msg, &path) == -1 )
+ if ( set_ruri(msg, &uri) == -1 )
goto error1;
msg->force_send_socket = sock_info;
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
