+1for new module to drive SANGOMA cards in for transcoding (similar to driving the rtpproxy or mediaproxy)
Regards, Sammy On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Ali Pey <ali...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do also see a lot of value in sip over websocket. WebRTC is pretty much > here and it makes much more sense to be able to support it on one proxy > server rather than having to use OverSIP and then OpenSIPS. WebRTC seems to > be very popular and the thing of tomorrow and it will be very important for > a sip proxy server to support it. > > Regards, > Ali Pey > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé < > s...@ag-projects.com> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 26, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Duane Larson wrote: >> >> > Is there any roadmap for "SIP over Websocket"? I know there is now >> OverSIP but wasn't sure if OpenSIPS had any plans to implement a module. >> Just asking since WebRTC is still evolving. >> > >> >> I personally don't see the need to do it in the 1.x series. You can use >> OverSIP to do protocol translation to TCP/TLS and send the call to >> OpenSIPS. Now, IIRC there was some problem in parsing the Via headers, >> because they now have a different transport parameter (ws and wss), but I >> think someone posted a patch already. >> >> -- >> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé >> AG Projects >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> de...@lists.opensips.org >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users