The 5xx_replies would be non-zero because you are sending stateless 503 replies. Either using “sl_send_reply” or calling “send_reply” from the signaling module without creating a transaction first. This makes sense for sending negative OPTIONS replies; you don’t want to create a transaction for that you just reply quickly and statelessly and your count goes up.
The 5xx_transactions counter increments for any transaction that ends with a 5xx response *to* OpenSIPS, you are correct about that part. But if you have a single transaction and OpenSIPS receives a 5xx response and then relays that response upstream, 5xx_replies will not be incremented. So it is not as simple as the from and to. Similarly, if you were to forward a message downstream statelessly, without creating a transaction or using TM, and then received a 5xx response, 5xx_transactions counter would not be incremented because there was no transaction. But 5xx _replies would be incremented when you relayed the response upstream, because it was done statelessly. Again, not quite as simple as received vs sent. Ben Newlin From: Users <users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> on behalf of solarmon <solar...@one-n.co.uk> Reply-To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users@lists.opensips.org> Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 1:08 PM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies" - counter not incrementing Hi Ben, OK, but why is there already a counter value for 5xx_replies - it is non zero. Actually, what I have just done at the moment is to put my clusters in 'drain mode' - so all SIP Options pings to it will be responded with a 503. When in this mode, the 5xx_replies counters are going up. Thus, I believe 5xx_replies is for 503 replies coming from opensips, and possibly 5xx_transactions is for 503 responses going to opensips. Thank you. On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 16:01, Ben Newlin <ben.new...@genesys.com<mailto:ben.new...@genesys.com>> wrote: Apologies for the confusion. So that is expected if you are using the TM module and creating transactions for all of the 5xx responses, as far as I know. Ben Newlin From: Users <users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>> on behalf of solarmon <solar...@one-n.co.uk<mailto:solar...@one-n.co.uk>> Reply-To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>> Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 10:49 AM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies" - counter not incrementing Hi Ben, Thanks for your input. It is the other way around - in my case, the transaction counters are incrementing, but not the replies counters. Thank you. On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 13:09, Ben Newlin <ben.new...@genesys.com<mailto:ben.new...@genesys.com>> wrote: I believe the XXX_replies statistics only count StateLess (SL module) messages. XXX_transactions count transaction handled by the TM module. So if replies are incrementing but not transactions, it means you are not creating transactions for these messages. Ben Newlin From: Users <users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>> on behalf of solarmon <solar...@one-n.co.uk<mailto:solar...@one-n.co.uk>> Reply-To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>> Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 7:37 AM Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies" - counter not incrementing Hi, I use opensips 2.4 and the command "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies" - as documented at: https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Interface-CoreMI-2-4#toc12<https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Interface-CoreMI-2-4#toc12> Thank you. On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 11:22, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org<mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote: https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.0.x/tm.html#exported_statistics<https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.0.x/tm.html#exported_statistics> Not sure where do you get these 5xx_replies stats - which module are they provided by ? Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com<https://www.opensips-solutions.com> OpenSIPS Summit, Amsterdam, May 2020 https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2020Amsterdam/<https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2020Amsterdam/> On 3/20/20 1:15 PM, solarmon wrote: Hi, I meant that the 5xx_transactions counter value does not increment. However, I have now found the stats counter "5xx_transactions". This does seem to increment appropriately. So what is the difference between "5xx_replies" and "5xx_transactions"? Thank you. On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 10:55, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org<mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote: Hi, Do you do understand by "stuck" ? no reply to the "get_statistics" cmd? or the value of the statistic does not change ? Both 4xx and 5xx stats count all transactions completed with such replies. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com<https://www.opensips-solutions.com> OpenSIPS Summit, Amsterdam, May 2020 https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2020Amsterdam/<https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2020Amsterdam/> On 3/19/20 2:56 PM, solarmon wrote: Hi, I'm trying to graph the 4xx and 5xx stats on my opensips cluster. I'm making use of the "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics" command to extract the 4xx and 5xx replies counters. The 4xx counter (opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 4xx_replies) seems to incrementing as expected. However, the 5xx counter (opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies) seems to stuck. One cluster the value is zero and the other clusters have an arbitrary high value. I'm expecting this counter to increase as I am seeing 5xx replies going to our opensips clusters. Are these reply counters for outbound or inbound or both directions? Why would the counter be stuck even when I can see such 5xx replies (inbound) in the logs and in SIP traces (using sngrep). Thank you. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users