On Jan 15, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Michael Heydekamp <listu...@freexp.de> wrote:
> Am 15.01.2013 22:05, schrieb Cor Bosman: > >> But why are you saying roundcube is the one adding it? > > Because it's a fact. See previous test mails. > >> I dont see it in your replies. > > Sure, because unlike other users, I don't set any Reply-To: (and therefore > "Mail-Reply-To:") at all. If I use the latest git, things seem ok-ish. On the message you titled 1.2, if I reply in rc it goes to the sender (you). In OSX Mail this is different though, with Reply it goes to sender+list. With Reply-All, in rc it goes to either sender+list, or the list alone. In OSX mail it goes to sender+list. Ive actually always used Reply-All if I want my message to go back to the list. Quite a few mailinglists will reply to the sender, not the list, by default. This because it's safer to mistakenly only send a public message to a private sender, than a private message to a public list. It's basically erring on the side of caution. Just always use Reply-All for lists, and you're good to go? Cor _______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
