Wake up and look at this:
Reply-To: Roundcube Users mailing list <[email protected]> The RCU mailing list stamps this idiocy on everything that passes through it. The mailing list for mail-related software is doing Reply-To munging. What's wrong with this picture? That explains why the same people think it's a good idea to have a "Reply List" button. On 14.01.2014 17:02, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 15.01.2014 01:46, schrieb Kaz Kylheku: > >> I don't agree with "Reply All" doing a "Reply List" if a mailing list is >> detected. The proper way to reply to a mailing list is "Reply All". Which >> means ... *There is absolutely no need for a "Reply List" misfeature.* *For >> users who really want this, the button should be called "Click here to reply >> in a moronic way if you think that RFC stands for some sort of fried chicken >> franchise".* > > WHICH RFC ARE YOU REFERING? > THERE ARE *MANY* IN CASE OF EMAIL STANDARDS > YOU ARE THE MORON! Someone who thinks that RFC stands for some kind of R. Fried Chicken is obviously ignorant of all of them.
_______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
