Dag, thanks for the clarification. Dag Wieers wrote:
So either I do not provide repomd metadata, or I provide the one I provide now. Nobody complained, there is nothing wrong with it except if you _want_ to use repomd format with yum on RH9 or older.
I think we can safely ignore people using RH9 these days. its EOL'd long enough to not really merit much effort being put into supporting it.
Or in the case of this bugreport someone who wants to use the RH9 repository with his FC9 distribution. *sigh*
These ones we might need to consider. I guess its just a case of $releasever getting in the way then.
-- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
