-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ralph Angenendt wrote:
| Karanbir Singh wrote:
|>> Or in the case of this bugreport someone who wants to use the RH9
|>> repository with his FC9 distribution. *sigh*
|> These ones we might need to consider. I guess its just a case of
|> $releasever getting in the way then.
|
| Hmmm. Probably not, as fedora lives under fedora/ and rh9 lives under
| redhat/ - that would be some strange acting up.

I think the problem is located between keyboard and chair of the person
mixing up "Red Hat Linux 9" and "Fedora 9". Oddly enough I have not
heard from a mixup between RHL8 and F8 yet.

Hugo.

- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

        A: Yes.
        >Q: Are you sure?
        >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
        >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIKDkZBvzDRVjxmYERAj5hAJ9oMlA+MUONS6QajSyiPZXDM8CYJACfYrY2
VDlEYelnEbJFOUVvqn8Q0Zs=
=JRay
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to