Hello, Sure, this is an UGLY regression which will break a lot of already written code. As far as I am concerned it definitely prevents the port of one of my contribs to 6.0...
S. > Le 8 juil. 2017 à 10:00, Pinçon Bruno <bruno.pin...@univ-lorraine.fr> a écrit > : > >> Le 08/07/2017 à 04:13, Taiji HAGIWARA a écrit : >> Dear all, >> >> I have a question on "sparse" function in ver.6.0.0 >> Sparse function in ver.6.0.0 returns different answer compared to ver.5.2.2. >> I am using Scilab 6.0.0 on Windows 10 (64bit) >> >> When we set same (i,j) factor twice or more, >> ie. >> ij=[i1,j1; >> i1,j1] >> v=[a1; >> a2] >> >> Scilab 5.5.2 used to return the sum of corresponding value, a1+a2. >> But Scilab 6.0.0 now returns the last entry, a2. >> >> Is it a bug? >> Otherwise, is it a intended revision? > > Hi all, > > If it is the case, it's for sure a very bad idea : the sum feature > of the sparse function is used to build finite element matrices fastly > in those softwares (matlab like). At least the usual behavior could be > changed by an additionnal option parameter (with the default set to > get the old behavior). > > hth > Bruno > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@lists.scilab.org > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users