Le 05/12/2019 à 23:26, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
Le 04/12/2019 à 13:30, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
Hello,
The name "constant" has been kept to ensure backwards compatibililty.
But frankly, sometimes legacy really sucks !
To me, "constant" should be replaced everywhere by "double" to
suppress this confusion. The argument that it would break some
toolboxes does not hold : we already will have to recompile almost
all binary gateways for the next release of Scilab. I don't
understand why toolboxes authors would not be able to release a new
version by just doing an easy find/replace in their codes.
Stéphane,
All ATOMS toolboxes are all together a very tiny part of all existing
codes.
Yes. But what is the ratio of "alive" codes ? When I see the
infinitesimal traffic on the ML, I have the feeling that this ratio is
close to zero (but not zero, right ?). The small number of *active*
users (hence having "active" codes) do not have problems to adapt to
(necessary) changes. In the past we had such (yeah, painfull) issues
(empty matrix stuff, among others).
We are no going to prevent improvements because there are some codes,
somewhere, with no maintainer, that could eventually fail after the
improvement. Codes with no maintainers are (most of the time) dead codes.
Please think about the future of Scilab, not always its past.
Samuel
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/1/c3RlcGhhbmUubW90dGVsZXRAdXRjLmZy/lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Stéphane Mottelet
Ingénieur de recherche
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
Tel : +33(0)344234688
http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
